Articles
Children in Swat face bleak future ....... 19
End of the Line for Islamabad............... 21
Pakistan under pressure ....................... 23
Pakistan Government Faces Tough
War on Border .…………………………………. 27
The Pakistan Problem:.......................... 29
Put Pakistan “on the Table”.................. 31
Afghanistan is a failing state ...………….. 33
The Afghan Mission ............................ 34
Facts Sheet on Swat............................. 36
----------------------------------------------
Working Committee
Zulfiqar Gilani (Coordinator)
Inayat Kakar
Jahan Zeb
Naeem Khan
Noor Maail
Waseem Syed
----------------------------------------------
Pashtun Peace Forum
19 Beaverbrook Ave, Hamilton, Ontario,
L8W 3S9, Canada
E:pashtuninstitute@yahoo.com
Web: pashtunpeaceforum.org
Editorial: Taking Stock One-Year On
The Pashtun Peace Forum Canada had its first anniversary on January 1, 2009. We take this opportunity to remind ourselves and our well-wishers about what we stand for. We believe this is necessary because it is easy to be pulled by events and lose one’s way, forgetting the founding purposes.
The Pashtun Peace Forum (PPF) is in essence not an activist group but aims to foster peace in the Pashtun areas through facilitating dialogue, discussion, debate, and analysis. We are a forum where different voices are tolerantly heard and the process of evolving a common voice engendered. The PPF plays a bridging role, receiving inputs, integrating them, developing possible peace-fostering scenarios, and sharing those with the various actors in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and the West.
We also believe that to tackle a complex situation like the one that prevails in the Pashtun areas, one has to be non-partisan, not ideologically driven, pragmatic, and humane in one’s approach. Our founding assumption is that ordinary Pashtuns, like any other people, want to live in peace, so that they may progress and prosper. Our attempt is therefore to connect with and strengthen such longings and thereby work towards reducing and eliminating the forces of extremism, violence, and destruction.
Unfortunately during its first year of existence (2008) we saw a rapid escalation in violence, the disruption of everyday life of Pashtuns, and the destruction of precious lives. We, along with many others, believe that the state agencies provided space and resources to militants and religious parties for short-term strategic purposes (See Farhat Taj’s article in this issue). We also believe that the state and Pakistani establishment are a major part of the current problem.
In terms of the activities of the PPF during the past year, please remember that members of the Working Committee are working people, who have to squeeze time out of their schedules to produce this document and engage in other activities.
Although it is not possible to determine causality, but we believe that the Pashtun Peace Forum has contributed to leveraging concerned interest among Pashtuns and others regarding the many and severe travails that the people of Pakistan in general, and Pashtuns in particular, face day and night. We engaged over 1,000 members and readers through media releases, the IDEA magazines, presentations, and seminars. Members of our Working Committee have been interviewed by a wide variety of international media from diverse countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Canada. Again, information provided by the PPF has been widely disseminated electronically in Afghanistan, Pakistan, the UK, the USA, and Canada. The Pashtun Peace Forum also made successful presentations in consultation meetings and seminars, jointly with Council on Foreign Relations –New York, South Asian Peoples Forum and the various Canadian-Pashtuns groups.
Amongst our key successes in our first year has been continuing collaboration with Pashtun youth, and AIRRA; and providing initial support to establish the Pashtun Peace Forum-UK. We are now receiving requests from Pashtuns Diaspora in France and Germany to assist them in opening Pashtun Peace Forum chapters there. We plan to further involve the international community, the Pashtun civil society, the Pashtun political leadership, and others to facilitate the empowerment of Pashtuns to bring a non-military solution to the war on Pashtun land. We are encouraged by the many communications from friends and readers from Canada, Pukhtunkhwa, USA, and Europe, which we greatly value and appreciate.
Finally, we facilitated screening of “The Frontier Gandhi: Badshah Khan, a Torch for Peace” film in Toronto, Canada, on January 14 and 15, 2009, with the support of ‘Peace on Earth Productions’ of Teri McLuhan, filmmaker and author.
We invite you to join us in trying to understand the current turmoil the Pashtuns are facing, and contribute to the movement towards peace and progress amongst a people who have been suffering oppression for long, but to who are facing increasing savage brutality in the recent past, which seems to be unrelenting.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Will the Gulai-Nargis (Narcissus) Bloom this Spring in the Swat Valley?
By Dr. Shaheen Sardar Ali
Dedicated to the girls of Swat who may never go to school again, from their sister who was fortunate enough to be educated
Today, the 15th January 2009 civilisation, democracy, human rights, rule of law, equality, justice and equity stand defeated. Today, the Government and people of Pakistan have succumbed to a disparate group of faceless, semi-invisible individuals hiding behind an opaque mask of religion and declared all girls’ education as outside the pale of Islam. ‘Iqra’[Read], a mandatory injunction in the Qur’an for every Muslim male and female, has been reduced to a meaningless word trampled under the feet of worldly gods speaking in God’s name. The great and glorious of the state of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, in a state of complete denial whine and whimper as the state recedes under their very eyes…………….. For today, the parallel ‘Taliban’ the only government with any writ in Swat has declared all girls’ schools closed forever.
But who cares for the Swat Pukhtuns from the back of beyond. Let them shut down girls’ schools and chop up heads, hang them from poles and tree tops. After all, Islamabad is thriving; we have a democratically elected President, Prime Minister and Parliament. Swat and FATA are very far away and only become significant when foreign masters are in town and demand action. After agonising, weeping, brooding and making angry conversations with whoever cared to listen, I decided to share these thoughts with anyone who may wish to read and capture the tormented soul of a Swati woman sitting continents away from her beloved homeland. Is the pain greater when one is far away from home and loved ones? Does everyone living in the ‘diaspora’ experience a sinking feeling at the sound of a ringing telephone in the early hours of the morning, fearing some horrible news waiting at the other end? Does everyone sit glued to the television set in the anxious hope of more news of Swat, FATA and the country?
How long before we will say: enough is enough and rise, speak and act? How much more suffering before we declare emphatically that we refuse to be harassed and silenced any longer and demand answers for the wrong doings meted out to us? How many more humans will have to be slaughtered, before we stand up and say NO! When will we shout from the rooftops of Mingora, Saidu, Kabal, Matta, Sangota, Manglawar, Chuprial, Dewlai, Madyan, Bahrein, Kalam: stop your underhand, hypocritical games, blowing hot and cold, killing us in the name of protecting us when all the while what is being protected, is power and wealth of a few and destruction of the people of Swat. Go and play your foul game elsewhere and leave us in peace. Stop our genocide!
But, who will listen to the pleas of the traumatised souls that are my compatriots: impoverished beyond belief materially, emotionally and physically. Not the evil Machiavellis of today who cast the net of violence over unguarded people going about their daily business. Not those perched in the superior location of the corridors of power and wealth, who are in a state of denial, simply looking the other way and celebrating their power and opportunity to humiliate the people of Pakistan by decorating the perpetrators of their destruction with medals.
It is that time of year in Swat when the harsh winter breeze cascades from the peaks of majestic snow capped mountains spreading its icy cold wings throughout the valley. As a child, I had bittersweet sentiments for these freezing cold winds as they coincided with my winter vacations from the Sacred Heart Convent in Lahore. Just when the sun would start shining every morning and I would want to play outside, the freezing winds would make me want to huddle indoors by the fire. One of my aunts [and later my mother-in-law] once told me why those far away mountains I saw were always to remain covered with snow… this is called the gunaangaar ghar [sinful mountain]… it is under a curse and destined to carry the burden of a snowy cap….Turning my head to the other side of the valley, I would see illum, another grand mountain lying between my home valley and that of Buner. This mountain held a more positive image in popular imagination as a saying goes in Pukhto: “May you become as tall in stature as the illum mountain.”
I now wonder whether it was us Swatis as well as that far away mountain carrying its ‘cursed’ load of snow all year round and visible only on clear sunny days from Mingora, that may have been under a curse. Why else has tragedy of the present proportion struck Swat and her people, making a reported 5 lakh people homeless, rendering as many others homeless and thousands dead or missing. What merited this punishment and terror, is a complex and mysterious saga details of which we may never fully comprehend. The stark reality is that hundreds of thousands of Swatis who have been peaceful, hospitable, people - now live a tormented life, inside as well as outside Swat and see their beloved homeland being destroyed by the histrionics of Machiavellian power play.
I know that at this tragic stage of our existence as God and human forsaken Swatis, it is all too easy to fall into the trap of recalling a romanticised past…. Yet for us forgotten and forsaken people, any respite must come from recalling our past and building on it towards a future. I cannot help but see, albeit in a mist and haze of tearful eyes and broken heart [but not broken spirit] images of those not so long ago times, when droves of tourists from home and abroad, would ply through the Malakand Pass and make their way to Swat.
We never used the word ‘tourist’ for these people coming from ‘khakata’ [‘down’ country]; everyone used the word ‘meylma’ [guest’] for these visitors and holiday makers, film production teams, honeymooners and families proudly showing off the ‘Switzerland of the East’ to their children who would then go back to school in Lahore, Rawalpindi, Karachi, indeed all parts of Pakistan, and narrate tales of the gushing waters of the river Swat, the tall pine clad mountains, the narrow dangerous roads, the clear sapphire blue waters of Mahodand [a lake beyond Kalam], the ‘white palace’ in Marghozaar where the tall mountains met…
I recollect those early years of my life when we had no piped water in the family home presided over by my grandparents, and when it was common every evening, before sunset, for women to walk through discreet side alleys, towards the ‘gudar’ (riverside) and ‘gaaga’ (streams) to fill their mangee [earthern ware vessels] with fresh, cold drinking water for their families. Images of dozens of women in their chaddars artfully balancing mangee on their heads and often one in their armpit walking single file down narrow lanes against the backdrop of a glorious golden setting sun on the horizon are still fresh in my memory. We children were not allowed to distract this daily ritual but on the rare occasion when my cousins and I would cajole our mothers and aunts into letting us accompany those assigned to fetch water, I would wonder why all the men suddenly seemed to ‘shy’ off and turn their heads towards the walls of the lanes, creating a ‘private-public’ space for women.
The male public sphere of this small village-like town would transform itself for a short while into female space with mangee-holding women gracefully navigating the streets and narrow alleyways. The same principle applied to the gudar where the family laundry was done. This truly was a picnic where one could simply rollick about in the green fields, tap your feet in the cold water of the streams, play hide and seek behind a bush, greedily pick the blackberries that grew along the stream, and the occasional scream when pricked unceremoniously by the thorns in the blackberry bush. There was the even rarer treat in the autumn when wild peas were in bloom and we could cunningly pick a few pods as we sauntered through the fields on our way to the water. I must emphasise that this was a regular all-women excursion and the only male intruder would be at midday when a male helper would bring the much-awaited lunch.
At about this time of year, in a few weeks perhaps, when the sun starts shining with a bit more courage and looks down on this icy cold valley, the gulai-nargis [narcissus] and ghaantol [wild tulips] will take heart and peep out of the muddy soil on the slopes of the adjoining mountains. Scores of women will be awaiting these first signs of the turning weather in the hope that they can go saaba-picking [edible green clover leaves, chives and a host of other saag type vegetation which is the staple food of most of the population]. Travellers along the road from Mingora towards Peshawar will find the familiar sight of young boys and girls holding up bouquets of narcissus and wild tulips for sale.
That is how I remember life growing up as a young girl in the Swat valley. My husband went to a co-education school in the town and his female classmates are grandmothers now. Sixty years ago in Swat, girls and boys went to primary school together; secondary and higher secondary schools for girls were full to the brim from where hundreds of young women ventured forth to the colleges and university if Peshawar and beyond. My induction as the first woman cabinet minister in the NWFP government in 1999 was widely hailed and men and women alike shared in what they saw as a collective pride and recognition of one of their own.
So, when, why, and how did the present nightmare unfold for us unfortunate Swatis? When did this serene, hospitable valley get chosen as the venue of game playing individuals and groups, local, national, regional, and international. What was/is the game plan, input and output and what is the desired result that perpetrators of the scheme aspire to achieve? Why choose Swat as opposed to adjoining territories with less accessibility to the outside world and governmental infrastructure. How true is it that so-called militant religious extremists are entirely responsible for all the horror, terror, death and destruction of Swat and Swatis and so-called ‘progressive’ democratically elected government is innocent and beyond reproach?
How true it is that the seeds of the present situation were sown by institutions responsible for upholding and protecting the national interest in 1994 when Sufi Mohammad took Swat and the entire governmental machinery hostage. The ‘black turbans’, as they were called simply emerged as if from nowhere and before anyone could take a deep breath, had spread themselves across the valley. The government of the time gave them some crumbs in the form of the Nizam-i-Adl regulation 1994, re-named judges and courts by using the names Qazi, Ilaqa Qazi etc., and assigned supposedly Shari’a literate muavin or advisers to assist the Qazi in administration of justice to make sure it was Shari’a compliant. People of the Malakand division as it was then called, had a choice to use the ‘Islamic law’ or the ‘regular’ law of the country. It is no secret that apart from a few women daring to challenge their male relatives to obtain their inheritance by using Islamic law, all and sundry stuck to the civil and criminal law of the country.
Some time later, dissatisfied noises started being heard regarding unsatisfactory nifaz/promulgation of Sharia, but it actually turned out that some of the muavineen, or ‘Shari’a conversant advisers, were angling for a raise in their salaries. This demand was of course met, as that was the easy way out and then forgot all about the underlying million dollar question: Was/Is there a popular demand for Shari’a promulgation in the region; how is this to be gauged; what is the problem with existing offerings and what/who is the underlying, simmering problem and issue’/s etc.
Why is it that this demand emanates not from more urbanised centres of Swat including Mingora, Saidu etc., but from outlying, rural areas where class divisions are more pronounced and landed class unpopular among the general population? Surely, if the demand was the result of delays in court and administration of justice generally, ought the people from the urban centres not likely to be the ones more affected thus proponents of the demand for Shari’a?
Leaving the above critical question on the back burner to simmer and exacerbate, we now come to a neglected governance issue in Swat. This is the issue of ‘custom-chor’ vehicles that have flooded the market. Cars, jeeps etc are available for unbelievable paltry sums creating avenues for all sorts of activities outside the purview of the law. Why was this not dealt with and nipped in the bud earlier on when the problem was first spotted. Receding and abdicating state control and remit are terms that come readily to mind. The question I pose here is: Was the state apparatus unaware of this and the wider, serious implications for government and governance not to mention the lost revenue and financial fallout? Is it rocket science to decipher the fact that when you give an inch, a yard is what is generally being conceded? The signal given to those who may have had intentions of violent adventures in the area would be quite clear: go ahead and do what you want; there is very little to stop you.
Deep in the forests of Swat, it was being reported that when government officials went on inspection tours of the area, they were stopped at the foot of the mountains where the thick pine forests started. The local population also reported periodic ‘earthquake-like’ happenings as if a bomb has gone off; they were spotting unfamiliar people on the roads, were generally confused but as unsuspecting people focussing on earning two square meals for their families, never thought more of it. Neither did they know whom to report this entire strange goings on to; who would listen to poor villagers in the first place?
Hospital staff in the several hospitals and health facilities recollect numerous men and women patients who ‘did not look like us’, spoke a very strong sounding language, the men had ‘long hair and sort of chinky eyes’, etc etc., These sightings started about two summers ago but no governmental, agency picked this up, or did they…….?
Is it possible that the few thousands of militants are so superior in arms and training that the 7th largest army in the world is unable to out manoeuvre them? Are the government structures and institutions so weak that access lines to arms and ammunition cannot be cut off? But the critical questions of all, that Swatis are asking themselves and the world: Who are these ‘people’ who have captured their land, terrorised them to death, why and for what end and purpose? As citizens of this country, Swatis demand answers to these questions and for the government to take responsibility for leaving them without security, succour and sustenance.
The writer is Professor of Law, University of Warwick, United Kingdom, Professor II, University of Oslo, Norway and Member of the UN Working Group on Arbitrary detention. She was formerly Professor of law, University of Peshawar . She also served as a provincial health minister during the 2000-04 interim government. Email: s.s.ali@warwick.ac.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Replicating the Al Anbar model in FATA?
Saturday, January 31, 2009, Farhat Taj
http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=159976
Al Anbar is a region in Iraq that was devastated by Al Qaeda inflicted violence. Several Sunni tribes of the region formed an alliance, supported by the US, and took up arms against the terrorists. The tribes successfully controlled Al Qaeda terrorism and stabilized the region. In media it was called 'Al Anbar Awakening'.
All over the world think tanks studying the situation in FATA debate and discuss whether an Al Anbar style awakening is possible in FATA? Can FATA tribes take up arms against the Taliban and Al Qaeda? In my opinion there is tremendous potential for an Al Anbar style awakening in FATA. But there is one huge obstacle: the mistrust of the tribes in the military leadership, especially the intelligence agencies. The Taliban and Al Qaeda have been target killing tribal leaders and so far the military has failed to protect the latter. So far no one has even been officially accused or arrested of the target killing of more than 200 tribal leaders.
The target killing of the tribal leaders started in South Waziristan almost at the same time when the US was bombing Taliban and Al Qaeda hideouts in Afghanistan in 2001 and the militants ran towards Waziristan. They were not welcomed by the tribal leaders. In order to have a strong foothold in Waziristan, the militants killed more than 120 tribal leaders. Clearly the then government of General Pervez Musharraf was playing a double game. On one hand it joined the US led war on terror, on the other hand it allowed the militants to kill the tribal leaders and replace the tribal order with the Taliban order.
Next the killing spree was taken to other tribal areas including Khyber, Orakzai and Bajaur agencies. There is a strong perception among many Pakhtun that this killing was carried out with tacit consent of the intelligence agencies of Pakistan to create full leadership space for Taliban in the Pakhtun tribal society. This is the key obstacle that is preventing the remaining tribal leaders and young people in FATA from taking up arms against the Taliban and Al Qaida.
Despite this there is still a strong potential in FATA tribal leaders and young people to challenge the terrorists. I conclude this from the surveys conducted by AIRRA, an independent think tank working on human security, regional cooperation and radicalization, previous events in the area and my personal discussions with young men and women of FATA: They pointed out that in tehsil Pranghar of Momand Agency, the people rose against the Taliban as soon as the Taliban first assaulted Momand Agency. Consequesntly, Tangi in district Charsadda is safe because of this event. Since 2004, we find sporadic uprisings against the Taliban but due to the inability of the Pakistani security forces, the leaders of Qaumi Lashkars (national laskars) were mostly target killed by the Taliban. If the elders and the youth of the Pakhtun belt are taken into confidence and assured that an anti-Taliban tribal army will not be marked for target killing, the uprising can succeed.
But for that to happen Pakistan army and the government of Pakistan have to take some confidence building measures to restore the faith of the tribes. I had discussions with some tribal men and women during my recent visit to Pakistan. They suggested the following as confidence building measures. One, some, if not all Taliban leaders must be target killed by Pakistan army. Two, all security forces must be issued a kill at sight order against the first and second layers of all Taliban and Al Qaida groups in Pakistan. Three, the government should announce head-money for killing or capturing any top, second or third level leaders of the Taliban. They also said that the Pakistan army must closely coordinate with the tribal armies made against the militants. They pointed out that the tribal armies had been fighting for days and Pakistan army, stationed near by never showed up to help the armies besieged by the Taliban till the armies were massacred by the
Taliban, armed with much more sophisticated weapons than the tribesmen. They said the tribal leaders must stay in some kind of hot line communication with the top leadership of Pakistan army and government and in case of any Taliban attack, Pakistan army must send air borne commandos to help the tribal armies. They also said if necessary Pakistan air force must carpet bomb the Taliban and they are not averse to the ISI buying some suicide bombers in some kind of intelligence cover and sending them to bomb the Taliban leaders in meetings, just like they bombed the tribal jirgas in FATA.
I would request the government of Pakistan and the leadership of Pakistan army to engage in discussions with the tribal leaders to work out details to form tribal armies, to take on the Taliban. I would request fellow citizens all across Pakistan to morally support such tribal armies and build up pressure on Pakistan army to stand by the tribal armies until the Taliban are controlled and writ of the government restored. I would also request the international community to keep financial plans ready for prompt reconstruction and development of FATA after the elimination of the Taliban and Al Qaeda.
The writer is a research fellow at the Centre for Interdisciplinary Gender Research, University of Oslo, and a member of Aryana Institute for Regional Research and Advocacy. Email: bergen34@yahoo.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
A comment on Farhat Taj’s above piece, by Dr Noor Maail:
The article written by Farhat Taj is very interesting. She is really a brave writer. I have written a few lines on Genral Petraeus’ ideas (community army) implementation in FATA -Pakistan and Afghanistan.
We l know that a U.S. funded program to train and arm community members in Afghanistan's most dangerous regions as a way to defend against the Taliban has already begun. The U.S. will provide funds to arm the community force with the same weapons used by Afghan police. After training they will have the responsibility of protecting the people, providing security for the highways, schools, clinics, and other government institutions etc. Following this type of exercise, as practiced in Iraq (according to Farhat, Al Anbar), will land Afghanistan in the hands of warlords and the Kabul government will remain ineffective. For Afghanistan, my suggestion is to recruit and train more army to implement the government writ in the region/country. In my opinion, this will be a permanent solution to the problem.
Practicing this community based army in FATA may be effective like Iraq, but we should not compare Iraq with Pakistan. FATA is under Pakistan, and Pakistan has an organized and trained army (around 700 thousands). It is the duty of the Pakistan government and the army to protect their people. If they are ‘unable’ or ‘unwilling’, then the state and the army do not have the right to claim this region as part of Pakistan. I don't think that the people of FATA will trust the Pakistani army and even if they trust them, their sincerity is highly questionable. The Pakistani government, military, and agencies have always sought the cooperation of radical/extremist religious leaders instead of the main secular Pashtun leaders, because state want the dominance of religious leaders as they are easier to manipulate.
Pakistan's military’s interests coincide with neither with the interests of the West nor of the Pashtuns. Keeping Pashtun nation divided and backward might serve the short-term militaristic interests of Pakistan, but it is already backfiring against the long-term interests of the West and Pakistan too. The West and Pakistan, instead of alienating and pushing Pashtun tribes further into the camp of extremists, could reach out, assist and empower secular and moderate Pashtun leadership. I think if Pakistani army and intelligence agencies want the integrity and stability of Pakistan they need to change their policies and should keep good relation with Pashtun nationalists in Pakhtunkhwah and Afghanistan instead of promoting religious parties and extremist forces.
(Dr Noor is themember of working committee - Pashtun Peace Forum and can be reached at nm7075@gmail.com )
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rehabilitation Steps for Improved Governance in Swat Region
By: Shaukat Sharar
“Tiny Swat is (was) Oasis in seething World” is the title of an article published by New York Times on April 27, 1950, written by C.L Suzberger. This explains the conditions in which the people of Swat used to live. Nowadays the newspapers writes: suicide attacks , Swat under the grip of militants, bomb blasts, deforestation, mismanagement of resources, unemployment, inefficiency of justice system, people beheaded and, military operation in full swing and so on are some of the headings of the stories generated from the scenic valley of Swat; once a tourist paradise. The thrust is to find out answer to the question that how the region can get back the flavour of peace and prosperity, very much needed not only for the people residing in the valley, but for the rest of society as well. The valley offers a lot in terms of resources, if appropriate management structures are devised and governance patterns evolved.
Swat, as ex –state has a special constitutional status and needs to be elaborated and understood. It is neither a settled area; nor having the tribal administrative frame work like FATA. The people of the area vote, but their legislators can’t make laws for them and the laws are extended only by the governor with the approval of the president. There is a need to make legislation in compatibility with the local norms and having room for participation for the stakeholders in decision making process. It should be based on natural principles rather than technical laws, the answer may be some thing in between. It will be helpful for the rest of the country as well to experiment viable governance frameworks to transform the colonial flavour of administration of crises management to welfare oriented approach in an efficient manner. The present local government system has not yielded the required results for the area so far.
Traditionally, the society of Swat revolves around land management systems, which has deeper sociological implications. This issue is very crucial because the land settlement carried out and revenue record developed in early eighties is confusing and has given way to a lot of disputes among the population, and between the citizenry and the state.
The judicial system can’t get appropriate evidence to decide the cases on merit because different government commissions and courts have given verdicts in land disputes in contradictory manner. There is vital need for a revised government policy on the land management system to institutionalize the ground realities and provide space for better land use. That is one of the main reasons that people demand changes in the legal and institutional apparatus. The present revenue record also hinders developmental initiatives and can’t provide due support to other governmental organizations to take care of the peoples’ needs and initiate new projects paving ways for broader resource management frameworks.
A large proportion of the land is declared as forest land and the government is considered to be the owner, but for the local population, at large, it is not fair. A considerable chunk of population live on the so called “forest land”, and developmental funds from the government exchequer are spent to extend physical and social infrastructure to these areas. The forest department has grossly failed to protect the resources and devise proper steps for rehabilitation on continuous basis. There is a dire need to revise the forest policy, devising resource use rights that can fulfill the demands of most stakeholders in an equitable manner. For example, opening areas for tourism infrastructure and shifting from crown trees to fruit orchards to accommodate ground realities for improved livelihood compatible with global norms and commitments. People residing on hillsides have overwhelmingly supported revolts in recent past with the demand for “Sharia laws”, which they feel will provide them justice and prosperity.
Swat has a plenty of hydle power potential, very much needed for economic growth, and five letters of intents have been issued to private companies by the federal government. But the effected population has shown resentment to such initiatives and the companies have shown inability to correspond to the aspirations of the local population. In such agreements the government should consult the stake holders rather than embarking directly on such agreements. These initiatives should be clearly linked with broader planning and development frameworks of integrated resource management. It will then result in the improvement of the livelihood systems in short and long terms; and will inculcate patriotism with better sense of citizenry.
The mineral resources of the region are in abundance, but grossly mismanaged at the same scale. The classical example is “emerald mine” of Swat, having very good quality. No one knows that presently how it is managed and if any revenue is generated how it is spend on the welfare of the population. There is a dire need to develop a policy and support systems through which these mineral resources can be taped. The region is located near to china; the global production hub with improved land communication link with Pakistan. Apart from others, china may need these raw materials for their production houses. To be more optimistic, the region is a tax free zone and industrial estates can be established with the help of US and other allies to open up investment opportunities in the region to combat the unemployment. Poverty is considered to be the evil and gives impetus to all types of lawlessness and turmoil.
Tourism is considered to be the main economic activity in the valley. The region had all the pre requisites to support tourism, but it is grossly affected not only by the recent events but continuous negligence by the relevant circles. To initiate processes for improvements in relevant infrastructure to correspond to the thrust of urbanites, there is a need of conceptual clarity to differentiate between hoteling and tourism and to be inline with overall welfare and developmental frameworks. Some of the examples are; Swat has rich archeological heritage which needs special attention. A country with Buddhist tradition, especially Japan has great interest in developing these sites. To focus on the region there is the need to differentiate Udyana and Gandhara; and to frame appropriate steps to do conservation works and make it integral part of resource management systems. The present rules needs to be modified to make it compatible with the present day conditions/ situation.
River Swat is the back bone of the livelihood system of the valley, but in practical terms, if the current trends continue, it is going to be lost for ever. Its water is polluted which is causing health hazards to the people. Its land is encroached upon by unorganized construction, depriving the visitors of the scenic view. The river’s potentialities are approached in bits and pieces by different institutional frameworks and there is a dire need to have coordinated efforts for applying planning tools, which can then give way to appropriate management apparatus. Presently the functions are scattered around different government departments and most of them are virtually unable to correspond at minimum level, for what they are mandated. This river is a treasure for the national integrity and prosperity; as it is the only main river originated from the soil of Pakistan.
Swat is getting a lot of expatriate money; which mainly goes to the real estate sector with out any land use control due to un-availability of secure investment opportunities. Absence of planning and appropriate building by-laws is allowing distorting the face of scenic Swat and affecting the physical and social infrastructure very badly; giving way to litigation in many cases. Through public- private partnerships, if due planning and management support is provided, these monetary resources can be diverted to other sectors mentioned above. Even though, proper housing is also the top priority of the growing population of the region with changing life styles as well as for those who intends to spend good summer in Swat to avoid harsh weather conditions of the plains. (An alternate framework needs to be devised even in this time of high crises in the region)
In the recent operation the people of Swat has overwhelmingly shown desire for peace; they will defiantly support initiatives for prosperity; if due care is taken of the vulnerable by government; while taping the resources in equitable manner. The technology to support such like initiatives is now available; to process the information in multiplicity; use it for peace building measures and should be used for prosperity and confidence building measures.
Now it is high time to update this information for developing a vision to provide basis for prosperous future and to reconstruct the tarnished image of the region regarding law and order situation. All this can then transform the signals of the caring state having love for its citizenry. Swat has all the potentialities to be showcased as a symbol of peace in the current global scenario.
The government has already hinted of offering a development package and the president of Pakistan has said that the operation in the region was vital for the integrity of the country, it is evident that the region has geo strategic location and has global implications to shape the future world. It is high time that the system with political well has to put all its efforts to device a framework in consultative manner with the populace and other wings of the system and actors so as to correspond to the potentialities of the region in a judicious manner for sustained harmony; keeping in view the global realities having respect for the diversity with knowledge based solutions.
Email: shaukatsharar@gmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plight of women in Swat
By Khurshid Khan, Dec 31, 2008
http://dawn.com/2008/12/31/ed.htm#5
THE current situation in Swat is such that any sign of peace in the valley has been washed away. The people are living through the most miserable phase of their history. No doubt, the valley has witnessed invasions, turbulence, and chaos from the time of Alexander’s invasion in 327 BC to the formation of Swat state in 1917.
However, at least in living memory the present chaos engendered by militancy has no parallel. It has adversely affected the physical and cultural environment, the economy, tourism, trade, governance and social life in the valley.
Unfortunately, in all this, women have been the worst sufferers. The militants’ obscurant version of Islam begins and ends with womenfolk. According to their belief, women are the source of all sins. A cleric while delivering the Friday sermon in Marghazar village was heard telling his flock, “My fellow Muslims, listen! The prices of daily commodities are rising because women abandon their homes and loiter about in the markets.”
In fact, the Fazlullah-led militants have announced a complete ban on female education from Jan 15, 2008 on FM radio. Some days ago, they announced that no government or private educational institution would be allowed to enroll girls and that all schools and colleges should stop educating them by Jan 15. Schools found violating this ban would be blown up. Taliban spokesman Muslim Khan somewhat modified the announcement saying that schools would remain closed until an Islamic curriculum was devised for imparting education to girls.
Parents and students have lost hope of schools reopening in this volatile atmosphere. The militants have usually been seen to follow up on their words and, despite the army’s presence, there have been no signs of the restoration of peace and harmony.
The militants have bombed or torched more than 100 girls’ schools and colleges to forcibly stop 80,000 girls from going to school in the district. There were 10 high schools, four higher secondary schools and four degree-awarding colleges and a network of primary schools across the district for girls and women, besides a postgraduate institution for young men and women to study at the master’s level.
Against the culture of keeping womenfolk away from development, the rulers of Swat state (1917-1969) encouraged female literacy, the first step on the way to progress, by establishing girls’ schools and colleges. The valley had the highest female literacy rate as compared to neighbouring districts.
After the fall of the Taliban in Afghanistan, their repressive activities started getting support in the Pakhtun areas of Pakistan along the Durand Line. Swat is among the more recent victims of Talibanisation. The secular nature of Swati society is slowly and gradually leaning towards extremism.
The clergy first started speaking against girls’ and women’s education through unauthorised FM radios and at public gatherings. But as they got more emboldened, they attempted to stall female education — and eliminate the presence of girls and women in the market — through fiercer means including bomb blasts. Many schools have been destroyed in this way.
Then they turned their wrath on women doctors and the female nursing staff in hospitals warning them to observe strict purdah, confine themselves only to wards for women and not to attend calls on their cellphones. The medical superintendent of a group of hospitals complied with the order and circulated a notice to the entire female staff telling them to do as they had been told. Women patients and visitors were also advised to conform to Taliban instructions.
Militants also ordered the segregation of students at the Saidu Medical College, telling the principal to keep away women students from research labs after a certain time. Meanwhile, another college refused to take in women because of the continuous threats of the militants from 2007 onwards. Militants regularly monitor hospitals and colleges. In fact, working women and those attending school or college, or going to the doctor or in the marketplace are given a bad character by the militants.
Indiscriminate mortar shelling has hit houses and killed and injured civilians. In these, the toll for women casualties has been higher since they are more often at home, while unannounced road obstructions or curfews have made sudden medical emergencies, especially among pregnant women, difficult to be attended to. As a consequence women have lost their newborns as they have not been able to make it to the hospital in time. Besides, with their men also casualties of militancy, many of them are losing breadwinners in the family.
The threatened closure of educational institutions has proved to be the last nail in the coffin. The mindset of the militants — who routinely resort to the violation of fundamental rights in order to accomplish their goal — is clear and their misused and illegal authority has led them to establish a state within a state. Swat is not a no-man’s-land and is very much an integral part of the country. By tradition its inhabitants are not religious bigots. In fact, society in Swat is more civilised and accommodating of opinions than the rest of the Pakhtun belt. Islamabad should understand that and break its silence to take assertive action against the militants if it does not want Talibanisation to engulf the area and paralyse the entire structure of society.
Where are all the international and national human rights organisations and women rights groups? They must raise a collective voice against this victimisation of Swati women and girls. It is also time for the media to take drastic steps to highlight the current lot of Swati women whose repressive treatment should also serve as a wake-up call for women parliamentarians to take an active part in rescuing them from the spread of a venomous culture. Email: udyana64@yahoo.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diary of a Pakistani schoolgirl – Part I
By Abdul Hai Kakar
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7834402.stm
Private schools in Pakistan's troubled north-western Swat district have been ordered to close in a Taleban edict banning girls' education. Militants seeking to impose their austere interpretation of Sharia law have destroyed about 150 schools in the past year. Five more were blown up despite a government pledge to safeguard education, it was reported on Monday. Here a seventh grade schoolgirl (Gul Makai) from Swat chronicles how the ban has affected her and her classmates. The diary first appeared on BBC Urdu online.
THURSDAY JANUARY 15: NIGHT FILLED WITH ARTILLERY FIRE
The night was filled with the noise of artillery fire and I woke up three times. But since there was no school I got up later at 10 am. Afterwards, my friend came over and we discussed our homework.
|
The Taleban have repeatedly targeted schools in Swat
|
Today is 15 January, the last day before the Taleban's edict comes into effect, and my friend was discussing homework as if nothing out of the ordinary had happened.
Today, I also read the diary written for the BBC (in Urdu) and published in the newspaper. My mother liked my pen name 'Gul Makai' and said to my father 'why not change her name to Gul Makai?' I also like the name because my real name means 'grief stricken'.
My father said that some days ago someone brought the printout of this diary saying how wonderful it was. My father said that he smiled but could not even say that it was written by his daughter.
WEDNESDAY 14 JANUARY: I MAY NOT GO TO SCHOOL AGAIN
I was in a bad mood while going to school because winter vacations are starting from tomorrow. The principal announced the vacations but did not mention the date the school was to reopen. This was the first time this has happened.
In the past the reopening date was always announced clearly. The principal did not inform us about the reason behind not announcing the school reopening, but my guess was that the Taleban had announced a ban on girls' education from 15 January.
This time round, the girls were not too excited about vacations because they knew if the Taleban implemented their edict they would not be able to come to school again. Some girls were optimistic that the schools would reopen in February but others said that their parents had decided to shift from Swat and go to other cities for the sake of their education.
Since today was the last day of our school, we decided to play in the playground a bit longer. I am of the view that the school will one day reopen but while leaving I looked at the building as if I would not come here again.
FRIDAY 9 JANUARY: THE MAULANA GOES ON LEAVE?
Today at school I told my friends about my trip to Bunair. They said that they were sick and tired of hearing the Bunair story. We discussed the rumours about the death of Maulana Shah Dauran, who used to give speeches on FM radio. He was the one who announced the ban on girls attending school.
Some girls said that he was dead but others disagreed. The rumours of his death are circulating because he did not deliver a speech the night before on FM radio. One girl said that he had gone on leave.
Since there was no tuition on Friday, I played the whole afternoon. I switched on the TV in the evening and heard about the blasts in Lahore. I said to myself 'why do these blasts keep happening in Pakistan?'
WEDNESDAY 7 JANUARY: NO FIRING OR FEAR
I have come to Bunair to spend Muharram (a Muslim holiday) on vacation. I adore Bunair because of its mountains and lush green fields. My Swat is also very beautiful but there is no peace. But in Bunair there is peace and tranquillity. Neither is there any firing nor any fear. We all are very happy.
Today we went to Pir Baba mausoleum and there were lots of people there. People are here to pray while we are here for an excursion. There are shops selling bangles, ear rings, lockets and other artificial jewellery. I thought of buying something but nothing impressed - my mother bought ear rings and bangles.
MONDAY 5 JANUARY: DO NOT WEAR COLOURFUL DRESSES
I was getting ready for school and about to wear my uniform when I remembered that our principal had told us not to wear uniforms - and come to school wearing normal clothes instead. So I decided to wear my favourite pink dress. Other girls in school were also wearing colourful dresses and the school presented a homely look. My friend came to me and said, 'for God's sake, answer me honestly, is our school going to be attacked by the Taleban?' During the morning assembly we were told not to wear colourful clothes as the Taleban would object to it.
I came back from school and had tuition sessions after lunch. In the evening I switched on the TV and heard that curfew had been lifted from Shakardra after 15 days. I was happy to hear that because our English teacher lived in the area and she might be coming to school now.
SUNDAY 4 JANUARY: I HAVE TO GO TO SCHOOL
Today is a holiday and I woke up late, around 10 am. I heard my father talking about another three bodies lying at Green Chowk (crossing). I felt bad on hearing this news. Before the launch of the military operation we all used to go to Marghazar, Fiza Ghat and Kanju for picnics on Sundays. But now the situation is such that we have not been out on picnic for over a year and a half.
We also used to go for a walk after dinner but now we are back home before sunset. Today I did some household chores, my homework and played with my brother. But my heart was beating fast - as I have to go to school tomorrow.
SATURDAY 3 JANUARY: I AM AFRAID
I had a terrible dream yesterday with military helicopters and the Taleban. I have had such dreams since the launch of the military operation in Swat. My mother made me breakfast and I went off to school. I was afraid going to school because the Taleban had issued an edict banning all girls from attending schools.
Only 11 students attended the class out of 27. The number decreased because of Taleban's edict. My three friends have shifted to Peshawar, Lahore and Rawalpindi with their families after this edict.
On my way from school to home I heard a man saying 'I will kill you'. I hastened my pace and after a while I looked back if the man was still coming behind me. But to my utter relief he was talking on his mobile and must have been threatening someone else over the phone.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diary of a Pakistani schoolgirl – Part II
By Abdul Hai Kakar
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7848138.stm
THURSDAY 22 JANUARY : VERY DANGEROUS SITUATION
I am quite bored sitting at home following the closures of schools.
Some of my friends have left Swat because the situation here is very dangerous. I do not leave home. At night Maulana Shah Dauran (the Taleban cleric who announced the ban on girls attending school) once again warned females not to leave home.
|
The Taleban routinely carry out public floggings in Swat
|
He also warned that they would blow up those schools which are used by the security forces as security posts.
Father told us that security forces have arrived at the boys' and girls' school in Haji Baba area. May God keep them safe. Maulana Shah Dauran also said in his speech on FM radio that three 'thieves' will be lashed tomorrow and whoever wants to see can come and watch.
I am surprised that when we have suffered so much, why people still go and watch such things? Why also doesn't the army stop them from carrying out such acts? I have seen wherever the army is there is usually a Taleban member nearby, but where there is a Taleban member the army will always not go.
MONDAY 19 JANUARY: ARMY IN THEIR BUNKERS
Five more schools have been destroyed, one of them was near my house. I am quite surprised, because these schools were closed so why did they also need to be destroyed? No one has gone to school following the deadline given by the Taleban.
|
The authorities are accused of doing little to protect schools
|
Today I went to my friend's house and she told me that a few days back someone killed Maulana Shah Dauran's uncle; she said that it may be that the Taleban destroyed the schools in anger at this.
She also said that no one has made the Taleban suffer but when they are hurt they take it out on our schools. But the army is not doing anything about it. They are sitting in their bunkers on top of the hills. They slaughter goats and eat with pleasure.
FRIDAY 18 JANUARY: NO POLICE IN SIGHT
My father told us that the government would protect our schools. The prime minister has also raised this issue. I was quite happy initially, but now I know but this will not solve our problem. Here in Swat we hear everyday that so many soldiers were killed and so many were kidnapped at such and such place. But the police are nowhere to be seen.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Diary of a Pakistani schoolgirl – Part III
By Abdul Hai Kakar
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7861053.stm
WEDNESDAY 28 JANUARY: TEARS IN THE EYES OF MY PARENTS
My father fulfilled his promise and we reached Islamabad yesterday. On our way from Swat I was very scared because we had heard that the Taleban conduct searches. But nothing of the sort happened to us. It was instead the army who conducted the search. The moment we left Swat our fears also subsided.
|
Many are opposed to the militants' policy of closing girls' schools
|
We are staying with our father's friend in Islamabad. It is my first visit to the city. It's beautiful with nice bungalows and wide roads. But as compared to my Swat city it lacks natural beauty. Father took us to Lok Virsa museum and I learnt a lot. We also have such a museum in Swat but I don't know if it will remain undamaged from the fighting.
My father bought popcorn from an old man outside Lok Virsa. When the vendor spoke to us in Pashtu my father asked him if he was from Islamabad. The old man replied: "Do you think Islamabad can ever belong to Pashtuns?"
He said that he hailed from Momand Agency, but because of an ongoing military operation was forced to leave his abode and head for the city. At that moment I saw tears in my parents' eyes.
MONDAY 26 JANUARY: HELICOPTER TOFFEES
I woke to the roar of heavy artillery fire early in the morning. Earlier we were afraid of the noise of helicopters and now the artillery. I remember the first time when helicopters flew over our house on the start of an operation. We got so scared that we hid.
All the children in my neighbourhood were also very scared.
One day toffees were thrown from the helicopters and this continued for some time. Now whenever we hear the choppers flying we run out and wait for the toffees but it does not happen anymore. A while back my father gave us the good news that he was taking all of us to Islamabad tomorrow. We are very happy.
SATURDAY 24 JANUARY: NO NAMES ON THE HONOURS BOARD
Our annual exams are due after the vacations but this will only be possible if the Taleban allow girls to go to school. We were told to prepare certain chapters for the exam but I do not feel like studying.
As from yesterday the army has taken control of the educational institutions for protection. It seems that it is only when dozens of schools have been destroyed and hundreds others closed down that the army thinks about protecting them. Had they conducted their operations here properly, this situation would not have arisen.
Muslim Khan (a Swat Taleban spokesman) has said that those schools housing the army would be attacked. We will be more afraid of having the army in our schools than ever. There is a board in our school which is called the Honours Board. The name of the girl achieving the highest marks in annual exams is put on this board. It seems that no names will be put on it this year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Children in Swat face bleak future
BBC Wednesday, 28 January 2009 ,Ilyas Khan
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7855198.stm
Many families in Swat district, in Pakistan's embattled north-west, are packing up and leaving after Islamist militants began attacking schools, reports the BBC's M Ilyas Khan, who is travelling in the region.
Nearly 200 schools in Swat have been attacked in the past 20 months.
Can the security forces establish the government's rule in Swat and protect schools against attacks by Islamist militants? Will the militants revoke the ban they recently announced on girls' education before the winter vacations are over?
For parents of schoolchildren who can afford to leave Swat and settle elsewhere, the answer is obvious. Leave. For those who have to remain, there are no easy answers. People are generally sceptical about the ability of the security forces to push the insurgents into a corner before 1 March, when school vacations end.
"Taleban are everywhere, but the army is only behind barricades," says one resident who, like most people in Swat these days, does not want to be named. "It can only make things worse."
Morale
More than a week ago, a Taleban deadline to ban female education came into force. The militants also bombed a number of schools, including those of boys, casting a shadow over the future of education here. The army is now moving into the remaining school buildings to protect them against possible Taleban attacks. But parents fear that schools where the army is deployed will attract more deadly attacks by the militants, endangering the lives of their children.
Swat is paralysed by a two-year-long armed insurgency by Taleban militants, who want to impose their brand of Islamic law in the district. The government moved in thousands of troops in the last quarter of 2007 to try to contain the insurgency. During this time, the militants have been able to put the security forces on the defensive by conducting a spate of suicide attacks on checkpoints, convoys and camps. The forces have also provoked anger among people by causing "collateral damage" as they struggle to hit militants who mix freely with the civilian population.
This appears to have hurt the morale of the troops and has boosted that of the militants.
The militants now control most areas outside the main town of Mingora and have a strong intelligence network within it. Destroying the government's education infrastructure is one aspect of the Taleban's campaign to uproot the existing system and replace it with their own. "In about 20 months or so, we have had 187 of our schools bombed out, of which 121 are girls' schools," says Sher Afzal Khan, the district head of the education department. Another 86 schools cannot be used because they are camps for the army or the Taleban, or they are in combat zones where children and staff cannot go, he says.
"Nearly 60,000 students have been affected," says Mr Khan.
Institutions of higher learning are no exception. "Three months ago, the Taleban banned male medical students from attending practical lessons in the gynaecology ward and the labour room," says a professor at Mingora's Swat Medical College. Soon afterwards, the Taleban started sending representatives to keep a watch at the college hospital to ensure the ban was not being violated.
"We had to shift gynaecology classes to Mardan (another district in the north-west). There is now a proposal to shift the entire college to Mardan, along with its staff and equipment," the professor says.
Moving away
Khpal Kor (Our Home) is a local boarding school that made its name by offering education to orphaned children.
|
|
I hope the army will establish the government's writ in Swat in a month's time. If not, I hope the Taleban will revoke their ban on education
Swat teacher
Taleban stranglehold
|
The school's revenue system was designed in such a way that fees raised from every five children of affluent families, called the "revenue students", would pay for one orphaned child's education.
In addition, Khpal Kor ran a number of commercial ventures such as a tent service and an IT college to raise salaries for its teaching, janitorial and kitchen staff, all of them well-paid by local standards.
"The tent service closed down due to absence of tourists, and almost all the students of the IT college have left as their families moved to other cities," says Imran Khan, Khpal Kor's coordination officer.
"We also have information that more than half of our 500 "revenue students" are unlikely to return to school after the vacations as their families, too, have moved away. This will put us under pressure to provide for more than 100 orphans." But many parents are still here and their children face an uncertain future. "I have nothing but hope," says a college teacher who has a son and two daughters that go to school. "I hope the army will establish the government's writ in Swat in a month's time. If not, I hope the Taleban will revoke their ban on education."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
End of the Line for Islamabad
By Fareed Zakari, Newsweek, December 6, 2008
http://www.fareedzakaria.com/articles/articles.html
Unless Pakistan changes how it conceives of its interests and strategy, it will remain an unstable and distrusted place.
If the Mumbai attacks were India's 9/11, then it has responded quite differently than the United States did in the weeks following that horrible event. Much of the debate among Indians has looked inward, focusing on their government's lack of preparedness, poor intelligence and bungling response to the attack. Senior Indian officials have resigned, some evidence links the terrorists to the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, but the Indian government has not rushed to war. Even the Hindu fundamentalist Bharatiya Janata Party, traditionally ultrahawkish, is advocating "coercive diplomacy," calling on the world community to insist that Pakistan implement its U.N. treaty obligations to fight terrorism. India is showing restraint for some wise reasons—the two nations are nuclear—armed and a military strike would only inflame Pakistani nationalism. But a democratic government, approaching an election season, can only remain restrained if its restraint yields something. If not, South Asia—and that includes Afghanistan—is going to get a lot more unstable.
Some have argued that India should use its intelligence and air power to go after some of Lashkar's camps in the borderlands of Kashmir. But one would not need spies and airplanes to find the head of Lashkar, Hafiz Mohammed Saeed. He lives and works in Lahore. Of course, Lashkar was banned by the Pakistani government in 2002, but Saeed now runs its "charitable" arm, Jamaat-ul-Dawa, a large and growing force in the country. The problem with Islamic militant groups in Pakistan is not that they are hard to find but rather that they are in plain sight. The Pakistani government has never made a fundamental decision to turn its back on the culture of jihad.
When one speaks of the Pakistani government, it's necessary to be precise. The elected, civilian government appears to be something of an innocent bystander in this affair. Initially, President Asif Ali Zardari denounced the terrorists and offered full assistance to Indian investigators. His prime minister offered to send the head of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence agency to New Delhi to help. Then, after the Army weighed in, the offer was withdrawn. Zardari's statements became more evasive and defensive. If anyone wondered who actually ran the country, it soon became clear.
Whether the Pakistani military was involved in the Mumbai attacks remains unclear. The Indians certainly think so. "The attackers were trained in four places in Pakistan by men with titles like colonel and major. They used communication channels that are known ISI channels. All this can't happen without the knowledge of the military," one Indian official told me. They're not alone in their suspicions. "This was a three-stage amphibious operation. [The attackers] maintained radio silence, launched diversionary attacks to pull the first responders out of the way, knew their way around the hotels, were equipped with cryptographic communications, credit cards, false IDs," says David Kilcullen, a counter-insurgency expert who has advised Gen. David Petraeus. "It looks more like a classical special forces or commando operation than a terrorist one. No group linked to Al Qaeda and certainly not Lashkar has ever mounted a maritime attack of this complexity." Which would be worse: if the Pakistani military knew about this operation in advance, or if they didn't?
The situation in South Asia is very complicated. But one thing is clear. All roads lead through Rawalpindi, the headquarters of the Pakistani military. For decades it has sponsored militant groups like Lashkar and the Taliban as a low-cost strategy to bleed India and influence Afghanistan. It now faces a choice. Unless Pakistan changes how it conceives of its interests and strategy, the country will remain an unstable place, distrusted by all its neighbors. Even the Chinese, longtime allies, have begun worrying about the spread of Islamic extremism. Pakistan needs to take a civilian, not a military, view of its national interest, one in which good relations with India lead to trade, economic growth and stability. Of course, in such a world Pakistan wouldn't need a military that swallows up a quarter of the government's budget and rules the country like a privileged elite.
The one country that could do more than any other to change the military's mind-set is America. For India to bomb some Lashkar training camps would be to attack the symptoms, not the source of the rot—and would only fuel sympathy for the militants among ordinary Pakistanis. To the contrary, what the world needs is for Pakistan to decide on its own that its prospects are diminished by tolerance of such groups. American diplomacy has been fast and effective so far. But we must keep the pressure on Islamabad, and get countries like China and Saudi Arabia involved as well. President-elect Barack Obama has proposed aid to Pakistan that has sensible conditions attached, meant to help modernize the country.
America also has much to lose if things fall apart in South Asia. If tensions between India and Pakistan rise, distracting the Pakistani military from the jihadists in its tribal areas, it will lead to much greater instability in Afghanistan and a freer hand for the Taliban and Al Qaeda. Washington, too, needs to see results.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan Under Pressure
By Vanessa M. Gezari Updated Friday, Jan. 2, 2009
http://www.slate.com/id/2207740
Militants are gaining territory—and strength—with astonishing speed.
Mohammad Rehan, a watchman at a transport lot attacked by the Taliban, surveys ruined
vehiclesPESHAWAR, Pakistan—The fields stretched to the horizon beneath a mild winter sun. A stream ran through them, and somewhere off in the distance, behind a stand of apricot trees, smoke curled from the chimney of a mud-walled house. A narrow lane connected the house and the village life it evoked to the loud, modern asphalt highway skirting Peshawar. We stood alongside this highway, in one of the transport-company parking lots that have become the de facto boundary between
This wasn't always the boundary. The tribal lands don't officially start for another few miles beyond the outer edge of the highway, and those lands haven't always been thick with insurgents. But a series of violent attacks in December on shipping containers bound for NATO troops in Afghanistan are just one sign that the boundary between militant-held land and government-controlled territory is creeping inward with astonishing speed. One night last month, hundreds of Taliban fighters armed with rocket launchers crouched behind the apricot trees, moved purposefully through the grass, and finally, crying, "God is great," they launched a barrage of heavy artillery at the concrete wall that separates the lot—where the NATO shipping containers were parked—from the countryside. The wall came down, fighters streamed through the opening, and more militants appeared on the highway.
"I was on duty, but when I saw such a large number of militants, I ran," said Mohammad Rehan, a 21-year-old night watchman. "If you fire at them, it just creates a problem for you."
Militants have launched six such attacks in Peshawar since the beginning of December, destroying some 300 Humvees and other military vehicles as well as supplies worth millions of dollars. While these raids have obvious consequences for international troops in Afghanistan, they also mark a new level of insecurity for Peshawar, a city of universities, kebab stands, and carpet dealers that has always had an edgy border-town vibe but that now seems increasingly vulnerable to a Taliban takeover. Mahmood Shah, a retired army brigadier who lives in Peshawar, estimated that, based on the scale of the attacks on NATO supplies, it would take the Taliban as little as 20 minutes to gain control of the city's key administrative offices and essentially conquer it.
"It's just a question of time," Shah said. "Either the government becomes serious, or if the Taliban do it, I'm sure they will be faced …with a civil war sort of condition, because the people are arming themselves quietly. So you will find that the people will start resisting, thinking that the government is doing nothing."
Suicide attacks in Peshawar killed nearly 100 in 2008 and injured more than 200. In November, a U.S. aid worker and his driver were shot dead, two journalists were wounded in another shooting, and an Iranian diplomat was kidnapped. A December car bombing near a Shiite shrine at a busy market killed at least 18 and wounded dozens. Before dawn on Dec. 22, masked men attacked three of the city's elite English-language schools, two for boys and one for girls, tossing petrol bombs into classrooms, burning buses, and wounding several staff.
Since late summer, the Pakistani military has been fighting insurgents in the Bajaur Tribal Agency northwest of Peshawar, which lies on a key militant transit route between the Afghan province of Kunar and the disputed territory of Kashmir. It is also battling militants in the nearby Swat Valley, once a tourist destination, where insurgents recently declared a ban on female education and where reports of beheadings and public executions are frequent. The fighting has forced at least 200,000 people from their homes in Bajaur and pushed militants into areas that have historically been more stable, including Peshawar.
Malik Naveed Khan, inspector general of police for the North West Frontier Province, has primary responsibility for protecting Peshawar, a city of about 3 million. From his office in a compound straight out of the British Raj—white columned buildings, clipped lawns edged with chrysanthemums, servants bearing tea—he commands a force of 48,000 whose territory is effectively at war.
"I don't see this as a problem of the province, of the frontier, of Pakistan," Khan said. "I see it as a very, very serious international problem."
A gray-haired grandfatherly man who chain-smokes Dunhills, Khan estimates the enemy force at 15,000 to 20,000 fighters. But the problem is not so much numbers as resources. A police officer is paid $100 a month at most, Khan said, while the militants get about $165. Of the 1,000 police in the city of Peshawar, fewer than 100 are trained in counterterrorism tactics, only 300 have bulletproof vests, and one-third lack automatic weapons. Because of a shortage of ammunition and training, many police have not fired a bullet for the last four or five years. (For the sake of comparison, the New York Police Department requires officers to requalify on their weapons twice a year.)
"I want the West to know what we are in and to sound a bell of warning, because I have been telling everyone that this is not going to stop here," Khan said. "It will grow into the rest of Pakistan if it's not stopped here."
In 2007, Khan lost 72 police officers. By mid-December 2008, the annual toll was 148. More than 500 others have been injured, many seriously, losing limbs or eyes. Khan tries to raise morale by appealing to his officers' tribal pride, reminding them that the force has a long and brave history. Nevertheless, hundreds of cops have deserted in recent months at the urging of their families. Khan has raised death benefits for the relatives of officers killed in the line of duty from $6,300 to nearly $19,000 per cop, including insurance payouts, he said. Families of the dead are given a plot of land, and the sons and brothers of slain officers are offered jobs in the force.
To fund this, Khan persuaded the provincial government to raid its development budget, an unprecedented move. Like many, he sees development as key to countering the insurgency. He speaks of creating a version of Roosevelt's Depression-era Civilian Conservation Corps in the tribal areas to educate people and put them to work.
"They'll have something to lose, and then they'll stand up to these Taliban," he said. "They have nothing to lose."
The attacks on NATO supply convoys have other consequences for Khan and his police. The containers aren't just being burned, Khan said; some are being raided by militants and thieves. In the markets of Peshawar, anyone can buy military uniforms, helmets, night-vision goggles, and high-tech weapon scopes, he said. He himself had bought 500 or 600 pairs of U.S. military boots, at $30 a pair, for use by his traffic police. (He had considered buying bulletproof vests, too, but they weren't the right grade for the weaponry his men faced.)
When I visited Karkhano market a few days later, I saw what he meant. The market stalls lead up to the arched gate that separates Peshawar from the tribal areas, lining the road to the Khyber Pass into Afghanistan. A cop stood in front of the archway waving traffic through, while another, strapped with ammunition, eyed passengers sharply as they approached. The shops offered toy guns, toasters, and flowered bedroom slippers as well as a camouflage patrol cap made by Southeastern Kentucky Rehabilitation Industries, a nonprofit that employs people in work release and welfare-to-work programs, as well as the physically and mentally challenged, and describes itself as the "manufacturer of a multi-layered cold weather system … developed for Special Operation Forces."
We sat in the shop of a man named Mohammad Baz Afridi, whose shelves and display cases held DeWalt drill sets, various pieces of military gear, and, somewhat incongruously, a box of OB tampons. He showed me a Liberator II Soldier System Headset, covered in camouflage, with a mouthpiece and attached cord and plugs. The model is especially efficient because it can be used "with practically any portable radio model," according to the Web site of its manufacturer, Tactical Command Industries. (On the night of the attack at the transport lot I'd visited, the Taliban spoke constantly over wireless radios, and the night watchmen could hear commanders urging the militants on.)
Afridi served us tea in flowered china cups. He confirmed that some of his wares had probably been stolen from the NATO supply convoys.
"What will the transporters do if the Taliban come in their way and put guns on them and either kill the driver or the conductor?" he asked. "The transporter can't do anything, because the Taliban will kill him."
Among the more interesting items in Afridi's display case was a thick operator's manual for a laser aiming device that could be attached to a gun barrel, its cover marked "Department of the Army and Headquarters, Marine Corps." The manual described the product as "Class IIIb laser devices that emit a highly collimated beam of infrared light for precise aiming of the weapon." It continued: "The Aiming Lights are for use with Night Vision Devices and can be used as either handheld illuminator/pointers or can be weapon mounted with the included brackets and accessory mounts. In the weapon mounted mode, the Aiming Lights can be used to accurately direct fire as well as illuminate and designate targets." Afridi had sold the device, but whoever bought it had left the instruction manual behind.
Khan, the police chief, estimated that he would need about $300 million over the next three years to build a force that could stave off the militant threat to Peshawar. He said he would happily accept equipment in lieu of money, promising to return it when the fight was over. He had made his case to the government, members of parliament, think tanks, and the media.
"They come here, they listen to us and get very alarmed, but they do nothing," he said.
Indeed, the government in Islamabad seems numb to the threat. The day after the Dec. 22 school attacks in Peshawar, amid editorials calling them a milestone in insecurity for the city, the News, a Pakistani English-language paper, ran a story in which President Asif Ali Zardari declared that the situation in the North West Frontier Province was "improving." Last week, amid rising tensions with India in the aftermath of the Mumbai attacks, Pakistan moved troops from the tribal areas to its eastern border. Although officials said the troops weren't engaged in combat, the areas they reportedly left behind—including South Waziristan, a tribal agency on the Afghan border southwest of Peshawar—are rife with insurgents.
On Tuesday, Pakistan shut down the road between Peshawar and the Afghan border while paramilitary forces raided the hideouts of criminal gangs and Taliban militants who officials say have banded together to carry out kidnappings and attack NATO supplies. But when the operation ends, the police will be on their own again. Peshawar is home to a military garrison and is considered well-defended, though the military presence seems to have had little effect on the deteriorating security situation. If Khan doesn't get more resources and training for his men, he fears that he won't be able to hold the militants back. And if he doesn't get help soon, it may be too late.
"These requests we fast-track, otherwise we don't need them," he said. "We lose the game."
Vanessa M. Gezari is a writer based in Washington.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pakistan Government Faces Tough War on Border
Vol. 73/No. 1 January 12, 2009, BY DOUG NELSON
http://www.themilitant.com/2009/7301/730103.html
After a yearlong effort, the U.S.-backed Pakistani military has made little progress in retaking control of Taliban strongholds in parts of the country’s northwest. From these bases, Islamist forces launch guerrilla assaults against U.S., NATO, and Afghan troops in Afghanistan.
In other parts of the country, the Pakistani government has taken steps to crack down on more Islamist groups following last month’s terrorist attack on civilians in Mumbai, India. The primary target is Lashkar-e-Taiba, the main organization implicated in the attacks in which some 170 people were killed, and one of many such groups that the Pakistani government has nurtured for years.
The United Nations Security Council passed a U.S.-backed resolution December 10 placing Lashkar-e-Taiba and four of its alleged leaders on a list of organizations that support al-Qaeda. Those on the list are subject to asset freezes, travel bans, and arms embargoes.
The resolution listed a charity group with substantial assets in Pakistan, Jamaat-ud-Dawa, as an alias for Lashkar-e-Taiba. Jamaat-ud-Dawa is headed by Hafiz Mohammad Saeed, a founder of Lashkar-e-Taiba. Saeed, who publicly disassociated himself from Lashkar-e-Taiba after the Pakistani government banned the organization in 2002, was one of those placed on the list.
The resolution was passed after the Pakistani ambassador to the United Nations made clear that Islamabad would take action against Jamaat-ud-Dawa once it was added to the UN list.
Pakistani officials then placed Saeed under a three-month house arrest. They also sealed dozens of Jamaat-ud-Dawa offices, arrested scores of its members, and froze the group’s assets. However, many facilities linked to Jamaat-ud-Dawa—which runs some 150 health-care centers, 8 hospitals, 160 schools, and 50 madrassas, or Islamic schools—remain open.
The Pakistani government officially banned Lashkar-e-Taiba in 2002 following a 2001 attack on the Indian parliament, which brought the two countries to the brink of war. However, the group continued to operate openly in areas of the country.
Following the Mumbai event, Islamabad also took steps against Jaish-e-Mohammad, another officially banned group accused of involvement in the 2001 attack on the Indian parliament. Pakistan defense minister Mukhtar Ahmed announced that Maulana Masood Azhar, founder and leader of Jaish-e-Mohammed, had also been placed under house arrest. However Pakistani ambassador to India Shahid Malik later said Azhar is not in Pakistani custody and no where to be found.
The Pakistani government has refused to hand over suspects arrested in the attack to the Indian government.
Lashkar-e-Taiba was founded at the end of the 1980s and had served Islamabad by providing fighters to the Himalayan territory of Kashmir, a majority Muslim area fought over between the governments of Pakistan and India. Lashkar-e-Taiba’s stated goals are to spread boundaries of an Islamic state under Sharia law, and force non-Muslims to pay tribute. The Islamist’s aim in the mass killing of Indians in Mumbai was likely to fuel sectarian violence between Muslims and Hindus and reignite armed conflict in Kashmir.
The Pakistani government has a long history of using reactionary Islamist movements to further the interests of the country’s ruling class. The Islamizing of the Pakistani state was carried out by the country’s military rulers, in part, as a counterweight to Baluchi and Pashtun nationalist movements on its soil. Later the Pakistani government established, funded, and armed Islamist fighters to extend its political influence in the region from Afghanistan to Kashmir.
Islamabad’s policy of support for Islamist fighters had previously also served the interests of U.S. imperialism—which backed Mujahideen forces against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan in the 1980s—until the U.S. rulers began to consider the establishment of the Taliban government resulting from that course as a problem.
Under heavy pressure following Washington’s invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, the Pakistani government turned against al-Qaeda, elements of the Taliban, and other groups in the country. It launched a war against them in parts of Pakistan’s northwest, predominantly Pashtun mountainous region. Civilians have been killed in the crossfire, and hundreds of thousands displaced as a result.
While Lashkar-e-Taiba is based in the populous eastern Punjab province in Pakistan bordering India, the Taliban is based in the Pashtun area, which spans the Afghan-Pakistan border. In Pakistan this includes the North West Frontier Province (NWFP), the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, and northeast Balushistan. The Pashtuns are the dominant nationality in Afghanistan, comprising 40 percent of the population.
Fight against Taliban
Top officials of the NWFP provincial government held a special cabinet meeting on security December 21 calling on the Pakistani government to conduct a “more effective” fight against the Taliban in Swat.
The Pakistani military made initial progress against the Taliban forces in the northern Swat region of the country’s NWFP, where they launched a major offensive last year.
Beginning the second week in December, Taliban forces have carried out a series of assaults on NATO supply depots near Peshawar, the NWFP capital. The depots are part of the main route through Pakistan to supply U.S.-led NATO forces in Afghanistan. In two weeks, six attacks destroyed more than 300 military vehicles and supply trucks.
Sirajul Haq, the local leader of the Jammat-e-Islami political party, encouraged Taliban attacks at a December 18 demonstration of thousands in Peshawar, reported the Washington Post. Many truck drivers are refusing to carry supplies along the route.
Lt. Cmdr. James Gater, a spokesman for NATO forces in Afghanistan, told AP, “There is no indication to us that there is a disruption to our supply lines at this stage.” At the same time, Gen. David Petreaus, head of U.S. Central Command, said the U.S. military is looking into alternative routes.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Pakistan Problem: Success in FATA Depends on Aid to Civilians
Ahmed Humayun | 08 Dec 2008
World Politics Review
http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/article.aspx?id=3012
In August, the Pakistani army launched a full scale military offensive in the Bajaur agency of the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA). Since then, fierce clashes have resulted in the deaths of hundreds of militants and the destruction of key Taliban strongholds. This forceful demonstration of Pakistani resolve is a positive change from past efforts. However, military operations will fail if they undermine the single most important principle for victory: winning the support of the local population. And currently Pakistan is not aiding the war-ravaged Pashtun tribes of the FATA.
There is no doubt that significant force is required to eliminate the insurgent sanctuaries that infest Pakistan's tribal areas. The fighting thus far has revealed an extraordinarily sophisticated militant infrastructure: Subterranean passages connect heavily fortified compounds, and jihadists utilize heavy weaponry that includes anti-tank missiles.
But the eradication of some Taliban bases will be a Pyrrhic victory if the Pashtun populace perceives the assault to be against them, rather than against the extremists. An estimated 7 million Pashtuns live in the FATA, in addition to 28 million in the Northwest Frontier Province (NWFP) and 15 million in neighboring Afghanistan. The tribesmen viscerally distrust federal intervention -- and not without cause. Unlike the four provinces of Pakistan, the FATA is administered by undemocratically appointed autocrats with colonial-era powers; development indicators in the region rank among the world's worst.
Prolonged fighting has shattered Pashtun homes and livelihoods. Up to 300,000 people have fled the FATA in order to avoid being caught in the crossfire. Refugees are scattered across NWFP and eastern Afghanistan, desperately seeking shelter in improvised camps with no electricity or running water. Women find it difficult to maintain veiled segregation, a deep affront to conservative tribal sensibilities.
It will not take much more for the government to lose any lingering support for the counterinsurgency operations altogether. Troublingly, nearly four months into the military assault, government representatives admit that plans for basic health and educational services -- let alone large scale reconstruction and economic development -- have yet to get off the ground.
To prevail against the jihadists, Pakistan will have to integrate humanitarian assistance and long-term development into the counterinsurgency strategy.
The immediate, short-term priority needs to be ensuring that the refugees' most elementary needs -- shelter, food, water, clothing and electricity -- are attended to, particularly as winter descends. According to the United Nations, relief agencies have barely obtained half the funds needed to help the displaced persons. The United States and other donors should prioritize the fulfillment of funding shortfalls.
In the long term, reconstruction and economic development in the FATA has to be pursued with the same vigor as military incursions. The FATA Civil Secretariat, the principal Pakistani agency responsible for development in the tribal areas, has a multi-year plan that provides a useful agenda for action. The job programs envisioned in USAID's $750 million aid package for the FATA are also invaluable.
However, existing programs have to adjust to the grim reality that many refugees may not be able to return to their homes anytime soon. Fighting in the FATA is far from over and reconstruction and development in several areas will be delayed -- in some cases for years to come. The Pakistani government and international partners should think about feasible medium-term plans to integrate the refugees in the settled areas of NWFP.
Realizing these goals will be difficult given the challenging security conditions on the ground. Aware of the impact of humanitarian assistance in swaying Pashtun hearts and minds, the insurgents are steadily escalating attacks on aid workers. Therefore, increased security for aid personnel is critical. As part of this effort, the Pakistani military will have to participate in the actual provision of assistance in the most insecure areas.
There is time yet to prevent the Pashtuns from becoming permanently estranged from the rest of Pakistan. The raising of anti-Taliban tribal militias in recent weeks shows growing awareness among many Pashtuns of the threat posed to them by the insurgents. But if the government continues to communicate primarily in the language of guns and bombs, then the struggle against extremism may soon be perceived as a war against the Pashtun people. And neither Islamabad nor Washington can afford for this to happen.
Ahmed Humayun is a Joe S. Nye Jr. intern at the Center for a New American Security, and spent the summer of 2007 in the FATA and NWFP researching Islamist politics.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Put Pakistan “on the Table”
By: Vanni Cappelli
That the Bush administration in the wake of 9-11 turned to the very entity responsible for turning South-Central Asia into a stronghold of Islamic militancy as a “key ally” against these same forces must stand as an instance of conceptual lag unequalled in the history of American foreign policy. Given Rawalpindi’s irreducible geostrategic paradigm of employing Islamic fundamentalism to crush progressive forces at home and extend its power abroad, it is as oxymoronic to look to it as an ally against radical Islamism as it would have been to seek to extend the wartime alliance with the Soviet Union into one against communism.
Pakistan’s army has shown persistence in its endeavors over many decades. Its ties to militants are not the vagaries of “rogue elements” but represent the integrated policies of the military-security services complex itself. Such an entity does not make a sea-change in its ethos merely because it has been threatened with dire consequences unless it switches sides—it only pretends to, especially if receiving billions of dollars in renewed military aid will be the result.
And if some of Rawalpindi’s jihadi assets have slipped beyond its control while the army conducts desultory campaigns against militants to appease America, all the better for portraying Pakistan as a victim of terrorism, rather than the state sponsor of terror it has long been. Allowing a powerless civilian administration in Islamabad to be the public face of the country completes the illusion.
American military assistance to Pakistan over the last half century has enabled Islamic fundamentalism, perpetuated the India-Pakistan conflict, and led over and over again to death and destruction. It has prevented the development of democracy, civil society, and equitable economic relations in Pakistan. With mounting evidence that Rawalpindi continues to support the Taliban in pursuit of its historic goals, it is now being used to kill American and other coalition soldiers.
The incoming Obama administration must confront this fact, and bring American national security policies in line with reality. Winning in Afghanistan means keeping Pakistan out of Afghanistan, and that means not only sending more troops and rebuilding the country, but forging regional alliances with nations whose ideals and interests dictate that they are actually with the United States in this fight. Democratic India, a rising world economic and military power which together with Afghanistan continues to bear the brunt of Pakistan’s recidivist behaviour, should have been the logical choice for “key ally” against terrorism once it became tragically evident that this behaviour had consequences for the United States as well. Yet the early strategic soundings coming from the Obama team are not promising. While correctly placing Pakistan at the heart of the region’s troubles, it seems to think that brokering an accord on Kashmir—with the major concessions coming from India—would somehow remove the incentive for the Pakistani army to support Islamists in Afghanistan, enhance the power of the civilian government in Islamabad, and pave the way for a lasting peace among the three countries.
This approach ignores the deep ideological basis of the ties between Rawalpindi and its jihadi assets, the enormous financial benefits that flow to the army as a result of its holding real power in the country, and the degree to which it sees continued conflict as essential to that power, providing as it does legitimacy to its leitmotif of “Islam in danger.”
Aggression can never be terminated by appeasement, especially when there is not a clear picture of the nature of the entity being appeased.
An American-Indian-Afghan alliance aimed at containing Pakistan is the only way to counter the fundamentalist geopolitical dynamic which produced 9-11 and the Mumbai attack. Such an alliance would raise an overarching security structure that would have the same effect NATO had on the Soviet Union.
By cutting off military aid to Pakistan, naming it a state sponsor of terror, and working with its neighbors to contain it, the United States and its allies would effect the same internal collapse of a malevolent order as occurred when the Soviet Union’s weak economy proved unable to sustain its military superstructure. That would give Pakistan’s democratic forces their first real chance to take control of their country, end the army’s sponsorship of terror, and prevent future 9-11’s and Mumbais. For in the final analysis, historical pathologies can only be dealt with by a transformation of the existential situation in which they thrive, not by the policies of appeasement which have brought on our present crisis. Email: vanni1964@hotmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Afghanistan is a failing state. It needs a Marshall Plan
Ashraf Ghani,Monday, 29 December 2008
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/ashraf-ghani-afghanistan-is-a-failing-state-it-needs-a-marshall-plan-1214980.html
The Obama Presidency provides a second chance to get Afghanistan right. The President-elect has made it clear a stable Afghanistan is his priority. That stability will only come when Afghanistan can govern itself. To reach that point, three key assets must be harnessed: first, American forces and resources; second, the instruments of national and international power; and third and most crucially, the Afghan people, who are as eager to see the restoration of order and justice.
The current impetus for a new perspective in US interventions comes from the military, in the form of the new counter-insurgency doctrine. Building on lessons learned by the British in Malaysia and the French in Algeria in the 1950s and 1960s, a group of thinkers organised by General Petraeus in the US have formulated the thesis that the struggle for the people is the central issue in any counter-insurgency campaign. While 20 per cent of the campaign might centre on use of force, 80 per cent depends on political and economic efforts. Under this doctrine, the definition of partners rests on the litmus test of dedication to the people. The incoming administration must translate this doctrine into a focused strategy for Afghanistan. This will require a fresh look at the polity, the economy, and foreign aid.
Afghanistan's first chance was in 2001, when the UN General Assembly and the Security Council resolved to create a legitimate government in Afghanistan. At that time, Afghans were united in requesting the deployment of forces to liberate and protect them and looked to the international community to solve 20 years of conflict. This open moment was squandered by a double failure: the Afghan political elite could not overcome their differences to become founding fathers of a nation; and international actors were fragmented and unable to build legitimate institutions. This created space for criminalisation of the economy, which fuelled the insurgency and corroded public sector integrity. Afghanistan has slipped 60 places in Transparency International's global corruption index.
The spread of corruption and bad governance imposes injustices, and often daily hardships, on ordinary Afghans, whose hopes for better lives are frustrated by the lack of services. These citizens want their current and future governments to be accountable.
Containing the threat of narcotics to the region and the world requires a bold economic approach. The break point between illegal and legal economies is a legal income of $4 per capita per day. In order to reach this threshold in Afghanistan, three major sectors of the economy must be revitalised: mining, agriculture, and services. Afghanistan is rich in minerals including copper, iron, marble, chromite, manganese and emeralds. With good governance in place, these assets can generate funds. Connecting farmers to markets through careful investment, organisation and infrastructure would provide livelihoods in rural areas. In urban areas, a fresh approach to municipal governance could mobilise the service industry, particularly construction, to create jobs. If Europe wanted to do more, a package of trade and enterprise partnerships could be as significant as any commitment of troops. And in the medium and long term, the most effective investment of all will be education and vocational training programs for the rising generations. Used for this purpose, one month of current military expenditures could change the life opportunities of five generations of Afghans.
The instruments currently used by the international community in Afghanistan, however, are part of the problem. The system can be made effective and efficient by eliminating the tens of thousands of scattered efforts, which create waste and parallel structures, and instead unifying foreign aid behind the single instrument of the Afghan national budget. The government and its international partners should delineate a set of objectives to deliver a dividend to the population and establish clear rules for accountability and transparency, including the creation of joint decision-making committees that bring international figures together with Afghan civil society and business oversight. This kind of partnership will require a new design for the use of aid, by a group similar to that which designed the Marshall Plan.
The present crisis was not inevitable, but rather the result of avoidable missteps. The Afghan population is still waiting, still hoping for an approach to answer their aspirations for a stable and just order. With that hope as its foundation, the right approach can bring Afghanistan to true stability.
Ashraf Ghani was Afghan finance minister 2002-2004, is the author of Fixing Failed States, and is chairman of the Institute for State Effectiveness: effectivestates.org
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The (Canada) Afghan Mission
Afghanistan, by the numbers
Jan. 17, 2008, CBC News
www.cbc.ca/news/background/afghanistan/bythenumbers.html
Col. Stephane Lafaut (left to right), Col. Francois Riffou and Capt. Bob Colborne get the lay of the land, Nov. 14, 2007, at the strongpoint in Howz-e Madad in Afghanistan. (Bill Graveland/Canadian Press)
Canadian troops in Afghanistan
There are currently three Canadian Forces operations in Afghanistan. The largest is Operation Athena with 2,500 troops. This is Canada's contribution to NATO's International Security Assistance Force. According to the Canadian Forces, this operation includes:
- A battle group in Kandahar.
- 30 CF members with the Multi-National Brigade Headquarters and Signal Squadron in Kandahar.
- 300 CF members with the National Command Element in Kandahar.
- 300 CF members in the National Support Element in Kandahar.
- 250 CF members with the Theatre Support Element in southwest Asia.
- Health Service Support personnel at the Multinational Medical Unit at Kandahar airfield.
- The Provincial Reconstruction Team in Kandahar of approximately 250 military and civilian personnel.
The two other CF operations in Afghanistan are:
- Operation Archer, 30 soldiers involved in training and in the transition of security responsibilities to the Afghan National Army and Afghan National Police as part of Canada's contribution to the U.S.-led Operation Enduring Freedom.
- Operation Argus, 15 members of the CF called the Strategic Advisory Team, which works with the Afghan government to develop national strategies.
According to Esprit de Corps magazine, an estimated 200 members of the secretive Joint Task Force Two were expected to conduct special forces operations in Afghanistan in 2006.
The number of Canadian soldiers who have served in Afghanistan is more than 13,500.
As of June 2007, 60 Canadian soldiers have been killed in Afghanistan.
Cost of Canada's mission
The military costs for the mission in Afghanistan reached $2.6 billion in March 2007, or nearly $1.3 million per day of the mission. The costs are projected to reach about $4.3 billion by the planned end of the mission in February 2009.
Canada's spending for development in Afghanistan up to May 2006 was $466 million. By 2011, it is expected to reach $1 billion.
The Canadian Forces has spent over $1 million on funeral services for soldiers killed in Afghanistan.
Tim Hortons in Afghanistan
Establishing a Tim Hortons location in Kandahar has cost about $1.1 million for the first 12 months, according to the Department of National Defence.
The Kandahar location serves more than 1,000 cups of coffee a day to more than 7,000 personnel from Canada and other countries.
Other countries involved in ISAF
According to the International Security Assistance Force, there are 31,000 troops from 37 nations involved in the mission. (see table, right). Troop numbers are based on broad contribution and do not reflect the exact numbers on the ground at any one time.
Local forces in Afghanistan
- Number of members of the Afghan National Police: 55,000.
- Number of members of the Afghan National Army: 30,000.
- Pay given to the ANA: $4 a day.
- Pay given to part-time fighters for the Taliban: between $12 and $14 a day.
Afghanistan mission to cost Canada $18.1 billion -CTV (Oct. 9 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Facts Sheet on SWAT- Education & Other Vital Data
By: AIRRA – Pakistan, January 2009
I- Statistics on the number of girls affected due to the closure of schools
Total number of girls in public schools= 84248
Total number of girls in private schools = 3,5000
Total girls affected = 119,248
Total number of lady teachers rendered jobless= 3425
II- UPDATES ON SCHOOLS DESTRUCTION IN DISTRICT SWAT
(UP TO. 26TH DECEMBER 2009)
|
Schools
|
Completely Damaged
|
Partially Damaged
|
Total
|
|
Government Girls Schools
|
96
|
26
|
122
|
|
Government Boys Schools
|
25
|
39
|
64
|
|
Total
|
121
|
65
|
186
|
No of students affected
|
Schools
|
No of students in completely damaged schools
|
No of students in Partially damaged Schools
|
Total
|
|
Government Girls Schools
|
17380
|
7156
|
24536
|
|
Government Boys schools
|
6298
|
14670
|
20968
|
|
Total
|
23,678
|
2,1826
|
45,504
|
No of Schools occupied by Security forces 20
No of schools occupied by Taliban 06
No of Schools closed due to fear 60
No of schools Specified for IDPs 01
Total 87
No of students in the schools occupied by
Security Forces, Taliban/closed due to fear : 13,874
1. Total Number of Students affected 59,378 (23.17 % of total enrolled students)
2. Total Number of Govt: schools in District Swat 1576
3. Total enrollment in schools 265,170
4. No of schools in Mingora city 27
Security Forces have been deployed to 2 girls' middle schools in Mingora city @ 30 Personnel per school. More over security forces have been deployed to Jehan Zeb College as well.
Other Losses
|
Girls' school destroyed
|
86
|
|
Boys' school Destroyed
|
62
|
|
Police Station Destroyed
|
2
|
|
Police Post Destroyed
|
12
|
|
Video Centers destroyed
|
80
|
|
CDs Shops destroyed
|
300
|
|
Barber shop destroyed
|
25
|
|
bridges destroyed
|
24
|
|
BHUs Destroyed
|
15
|
|
electricity Grad station destroyed
|
1
|
|
Main Gas Supply line destroyed
|
1
|
|
suspected Militant arrested
|
1677
|
|
Hotel Closed
|
700+
|
|
Hotel Industry related person become job less
|
30,000
|
|
Police Resigned from service
|
700
|
|
Displaced From(Kabal, Khwaza khela,Matta and Mingora)
|
700,000
|
|
No Of DPOs Transferred
|
2
|
|
No of DCOs Transferred
|
5
|
|
No of DIGs Transferred
|
1
|
|
Cable Network Closed
|
02 time
|
|
Cable Network blown
|
1(Ali cable)
|
|
No Of Children whose School are closed
|
400,000
|
|
No of affected union councils
|
34
|
Source: Prepared by the Aryana Institute for Regional Research and Advocacy (AIRRA) www.airra.org
Dear Readers,
We are encouraged by many communications from Canada and other parts of the world, but especially Pukhtunkhwa, which we greatly value and appreciate. Our deepest thanks go to those who contribute to the IDEAS magazine.
We plan to have an interview with Teri C McLuhan, the maker of the wonderful feature documentary film “The Frontier Gandhi: Badshah Khan, a Torch for Peace”, which was screened in Toronto, Canada on January 14 and 15, 2009.
If you find this magazine useful, please feel free to disseminate it, and of course help us make it better by your inputs.
Thank You,
Coordinator Working Committee
Pashtun Peace Forum –Canada
(pashtuninstitute@yahoo.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer
In order to promote discussion of issues regarding peace and development in Pashtun areas, the Pashtun Peace Forum (PPF) publishes articles on a regular basis. The views expressed in articles published in IDEAS or on www.pashtunpeaceforum.org are those of the authors alone. The authors do not represent the views or opinions of PPF volunteer board, nor do they represent the views or opinions of the any entity affiliated with the PPF.
------------------------------------------------
I D E A S
Bimonthly Magazine of Pashtun Peace Forum, Canada
November/December, 2008 - No. 4
IDEAS is read in Canada, US, Europe, Afghanistan, Pakistan and around the world!
EDITORIAL:
1. Standing up to be counted ..............1
2. PPF Condemns Mumbai Attacks......2
Articles
Innocent Queries of an
Innocent Child ......………2
Tariq Ali, Pashtun Nationalism,
and Taliban.........................3
Compatibility: The Pakhtun Culture,
Talibanization and Obscenity ............. 6
Swat on the verge of civil war ............. 9
Is it Khyber Agency’s turn now?.........12
Role for Pashtun intelligentsia ...........13
A Tribal Strategy for Afghanistan ..... 16
Frontier Gandhi: Badshah Khan, a Torch for Peace................................ 20
----------------------------------------------
Editorial Board
S. Zulfiqar Gilani (Editor-in Chief)
Jahan Zeb Khan
Naeem Khan
Inayat Khan Kakar
----------------------------------------------
Pashtun Peace Forum
120 Wentworth Street North
Hamilton, ON L8L 5V7, Canada
E:pashtuninstitute@yahoo.com
Web: pashtunpeaceforum.org
Tel: (905) 296 4612,(905) 277 2854
Editorial:
1. Standing up to be counted
As the Pashtun Peace Forum evolves and grows, we feel that our position on certain fundamental issues needs to be made clear. While we are not a partisan organisation, neither are we apolitical. We believe that it is not possible to be without a position, except for only those who are bystanders. Below is a summary of the principles we uphold, and present as an invitation for others to consider, reflect upon, and share comments and/or thoughts with us, or in other conversations. We recognise that each of the points require much further research and elaboration, but are being presented in this somewhat cryptic form to generate a discussion and debate.
We know that Taliban-like imposition of religious doctrines on the general population never existed in Pashtun culture and is a created phenomenon. In fact the ‘moulvi’ was traditionally provided space to run religion related affairs in Pashtun society. This lethal Frankensteinien creation has tentacles and connections both to Pakistani and geo-strategic power politics, details of which we will not dwell upon here.
A militant approach to resolving issues was never part of the Pashtun culture. Many argue that this was because of the Pashtun traditions of egalitarianism, respect, dignity, and fear of triggering an escalating cycle of generational feuds. However, the media seems to have developed and perpetuated the myth of the violent Pashtun, which is a misperceived stereotyping probably based on the widespread possession of firearms. Militancy, along with the Jihadi and Taliban methodologies, emerged amongst the Pashtuns during the Afghan War, fuelled and facilitated by the military under Gen. Zia-Ul-Haq and continued by successive Pakistani governments with the active collusion and patronage of United States, Saudi Arabia, and other Western countries.
The long-term and sustainable solution of the problems that Pashtuns face today are the establishment of true democracy; kick-starting a people-based political process; and greater and full provincial autonomy under a new social contract in the federation of Pakistan.
The involvement of the international community, especially the US, UK, Canada and other developed countries, needs to facilitate the empowerment of Pashtuns, to bring a non-military solution to the war on Pashtun land. In that regard Pashtun intelligentsia, civil society need to be consulted while political leadership need to be fully engaged to find solutions for the issues Pashtuns are currently encountering.
For greater economic opportunities and durable peace for all peoples in the region, it is necessary to move towards the integration of all of the SAARC countries, plus Afghanistan, on something like a European Union model.
2. Pashtun Peace Forum Condemns Mumbai Attacks
The Pashtun Peace Forum (PPF) – Canada condemns unequivocally attacks in the Indian city of Mumbai – the financial and cultural capital of India that has claimed nearly two hundred innocent lives.
November 26 attacks in Mumbai once again remind the global community of the brutality of the terrorists and the grave threat of terrorism that the entire humanity faces. Terrorists are especially challenging peace loving people of India and over 50 million peace-loving Pashtuns. Pashtuns stand solidly with the people of India as Pashtuns are the victim of the same brutal terrorists since the last four decades.
PPF proposes that a forceful response to counter the scourge of terrorism which is challenging Pashtun nation, India, Canada, US UK and the whole world requires a comprehensive global approach making it incumbent upon every government to have an effective strategy against militancy and terrorism.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Innocent Queries of an Innocent child
By Sidra (Swat Valley –Pukhtunkhwa – Pakistan, Sidra is currently living as an Internal Displaced Person)
(Sidra read in class 8th in a remote area of Swat. Her school has been burnt in to ashes in the recent turbulence in the heaven of the by gone days. She is a brilliant student and needs proper education but what could be done with the hardliners who are bent upon not only destroying schools but are anti feminist to the core. The ideas expressed in this article are the products of innocent Sidra’s little inquisitives mind. The following is the translation of her article.)
Is the gloomy and distressing atmosphere generated by Taliban and the government in Swat is reversible? This is a question on the lips of the parents whose children and the children whose parents have become the fuel of this blazing conflagration. The children who have lost their parents need support and sustenance. Do the government or Taliban ready to assist or take care of these helpless children? No, it is inconceivable that these unfortunate children will receive any help or support from either Taliban or the government. If they ever cared for the education and upbringing of these children, they would have never commenced this senseless and aimless war nobody really know that how many innocent people have lost their lives and still losing.
Have you ever troubled yourself to think about the lives of these people or they are simply wasted? Most of the Schools have been blown up and the children have nowhere to go to receive education. If there is no School, then there will be no education and no doctors. If there are no doctors, then who will cure the sick and ailing? It is impossible to become a doctor without formal education.
The Prophet (PBUH) has said that acquiring knowledge is the obligation of every Muslim man and woman. If you are true believers then why are you blowing up the beacons of enlightenment?
It is undoubtedly true that the girls should receive education according to the principles of Islam about proper dress and covering for the body. They will conform to these rules if the Schools are spared.
Women have lost the exalted status which is given to them by Islam, in the society today. Education is in dispensable for girls because it enables them to become a good citizen and a good mother.
The daughters of the president and prime Minster are receiving education in foreign universities. The daughters of religious party leaders contested election and became the members of the national assembly in MMA government.
· Why this harsh discrimination? Is this the war of Islam and infidels does the daughters of security forces officials not receiving education?
· Why these officials do not care about our education as they are caring for their own daughters?
This question will remain answerless for the coming few years in my opinion. Why are the little innocent children placed between the grinding stones in the war which is aimless and endless? This is not only my question, but the question of several thousand children and their helpless parents, who are forced to leave their homeland, Swat, with tearful eyes.
http://valleyswat.net/articles/innocent_quarries.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tariq Ali, Pashtun Nationalism, and Taliban
Naeem Khan Wardag
Since the Afghan War, important power quarters in Pakistan have been propagating a particular interpretation of the security situation in Afghanistan through a variety of means ranging from the vociferous propaganda of the religious right to the more subtle works and ways of the allied experts strategically deployed here and there. Joined the campaign lately have also some ideologues of the liberal left-in particular from Punjab - whose paradigm of the class-struggle fully converge with the “cosmic struggle metaphysics” of the extreme religious right at this point of time as far as their analysis of the problem is concerned.
Thus, it is not a wonder that the presence of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan as the prime cause of the problem happens to be the common strand in the analysis of these two sides. Taliban as the legitimate resistance movement against US imperialism is another “opinion” shared by the two groups. In short, the views of the two factions match in outline as well as substance.
Mr. Tariq Ali, a leftist writer, based in UK and hailing from the powerful province of Punjab in Pakistan, has for a time emerged one of the loudest voices on the issue disseminating his views on different forums. Like strategic and Islamic hardliners in Rawalpindi-Islamabad, who resent the presence of international forces in Afghanistan as the curtailment of their influence in the region, Mr. Tariq Ali is also hypercritical of the presence of US, Canadian, and other NATO forces in that country calling it an occupation of Afghanistan and imperialism by the US.
His recent commentary on Afghanistan came in his talk to the South Asian Forum at University of Toronto on November 14, 2008. This time Mr. Tariq Ali was more emphatic in pointing to US-imperialism as the fundamental cause of the problem and went a step farther to call Taliban a legitimate resistance movement against US occupation and an expression of Pashtun nationalist sentiments.
Mr. Tariq Ali has been propagating this unilateral view of the issue with such persistency and vigour that it may create further misperceptions if not countered with alternate viewpoints. The fact is, the problems of that region are complex and caused by a variety factors - regional, extra-regional, ideological, political, and ethno-cultural to count a few. The causes are also rooted deep in the political history of the region especially of the past 200 years. This is especially true if viewed from the standpoint of Pashtuns who have been the victims of the regional-global power-politics since 19th Century.
Nevertheless, Mr. Tariq Ali lumps everything under imperialism and anti-imperialism and finds a link between anti-imperialism, Pashtun nationalism, and Taliban movement. This highly reductionist approach may be based on his understanding of the issue or, more likely, catering to the needs of his own nationality but this also unfortunately conceals more fundamental causes of the problem. Mr. Imtiaz Baloch of Baloch Human Rights Council of Canada in his article published on different websites alludes to one, and probably the most important, of these fundamental causes by mentioning the term, “the dominant nationality” – a term commonly understood in domestic discourse in power and politics in Pakistan but less known outside.
This fundamental cause is the imperialistic nature of relationship between various nationalities in Pakistan itself and its implications for the wider region. A doctrinal acceptance of this fact can be found in an excerpt from the geopolitics course taught in Staff College Quetta - Pakistan quoted by Stephen P. Cohen in his book “The Pakistan Army”, which says that Punjab is the core of Pakistan and rest of the provinces are just invasion routes. An emphasis on the fact is also placed through such phrases like Punjab as “the sword arm of Pakistan” and “the bastion of Pakistan ideology”.
A further indication of this fact can be found in numerous punitive expeditions sent by the dominant/core nationality in Pakistan into the rest of the three provinces to suppress the demand of peripheral nationalities for due rights. In this regard, one can cite the three military operations carried out in East Pakistan against the Bangali majority beginning with “Operation Jute” in early fifties and ending at “Operation Searchlight” in 1971, which resulted in the killing of hundred of thousands of Bangalis and dismemberment of the country itself. Five military operations have been conducted so far in Baluchistan not to mention a state structure in place since 1947 that marginalizes other provinces.
If this domination were limited to Pakistan, probably, there wouldn’t have been much problem. But when projects were launched to turn it into regional domination thanks the growth in the power of the core nationality due to an absolute control over state structures and resources, collaboration with big powers during ‘Cold War’, rise of a prosperous middle class, the desire to consolidate Muslim identity vis-à-vis Hindu identity, and newly acquired nuclear pride, tremors were sent across the region.
That is how one good day in May 1988, General Zia Ul Haq, the military strongman from Punjab, declared to Selig Harrison that Pakistan has earned itself the right to have a pro-Pakistan Islamic government in Kabul that would pull Central Asia back into the fold of Islam -- and that Pakistan intends to establish its influence in the region stretching as far as Turkey and Iran. Two prominent military generals from Punjab, Gen Hamid Gul and Gen Akhthar Abdur Rahman Khan are said to lay out a meticulous plan to realize Zia’s dream. The alleged plan materialized in Taliban creation and Kashmir insurgency.
So much religious importance was attached to General Zia’s vision that when Nawaz Sharif and Lt. General Javed Nasir, the powerful Punjabi politician and the rather more powerful Punjabi chief of Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), visited Kabul after the fall of Dr. Najib’s government, they raised slogans of “Allah-o-Akbar” i.e. “Allah is great” and prostrated immediately after emerging from their plane on Kabul airport as if they have landed on a newly conquered infidel land. This open demonstration of hegemony offended Afghan officials even in the friendly Mujadidi government.
How strong the resolve to implement Zia’s vision was, can be gauged from the fact that at the time of the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, a little known but an all-influential ISI officer from a small town in Punjab, Colonal Imam was acting as an advisor to Mullah Ummar. In reality, his status was that of a viceroy. During the same period, some stranded fighters in Afghanistan had to be extricated through a special operation known as “The Airlift of Evil”. There are numerous other examples of the deep involvement.
The fact is, it is fundamentally the imperial overgrowth of the power of the dominant nationality and its regional ambitions not Pashtun nationalism that is driving the so-called anti-imperialist struggle. It is the fear of further loss of power and influence should a balance in relations between nationalities and states in the region emerge that is fanning the instability.
Alas, when Mr. Tariq Ali writes, he writes only about US imperialism and the status of Prsedient Karzai government in Kabul despite the fact that presence of US, Canadian, and NATO troops has been mandated by UN and Karzai has been elected by Afghan people through a democratic process and his govt is internationally recognized contrary to Taliban who had been imposed on Afghans and were recognized only by their three ideological and political mentors.
Mr. Tariq Ali never mentions imperialism in the regional setting and its adverse impacts on the people and communities there. That is why his recipe for the problem is the same as popular with religious and strategic hardliners in Islamabad-Rawalpindi, which implies virtual reversal to pre-2001 like situation. The purpose is the re-instatement of the local/regional imperialism of the dominant nationality and its control over Afghan/Pashtun population through religious fanatics and their medieval ways. If such dreams materialized, it will set the whole of South Asia, Central Asia, and Middle East on fire.
Contrary to what Mr, Tariq Ali propagates, Taliban do not represent Pashtun nationalism. They do not draw their inspiration from Pashtun culture, identity, or history. Their ideology has been imported for them from the real basis of pan and political Islam across the Indus. This ideology has more to do with the regional ambitions of the elite of the dominant nationality as envisioned by General Zia than with Pashtun aspirations.
It is also a wrong to say that Taliban are an ethnically homogeneous group. They are an amalgam of Jehadists from different ethnicities and nations. Prominent among them are the more ideological Punjab-based groups like Jaish-i-Mohammad, Lashkar-i-Jhangvi, Harkat-ul-Mujahideen, Lashkar-i-Toiba, etc., whose creation pre-date Taliban, although, this fact is seldom highlighted by non-Pashtun Pakistani writers. What they highlight is the Pashtun connection of Taliban.
When Mr. Tariq Ali equates Taliban movement to Pashtun nationalism, he greatly offends Pashtuns who have immensely suffered at their hands. One can mention thousands of innocent girls in Swat and FATA who have been deprived of education through intimidation and destruction of their schools not to mention thousands of Pashtuns that have perished in suicide bomb blasts and hundreds of thousands of them that have been displaced. He neither discusses the thousands of Pashtuns that have risen against Taliban nor their recent electorate choice.
Pashtun nationalism survives in the movements of Bacha Khan (ANP), Abdul Samad Khan Achakzai (PMAP), other political parties, and the aspirations of general Pashtun masses for peace and progress despite a century of marginalization. It is maintaining its power-base, standing its ground, and holding onto its liberal traditions. It will never allow its society to be permanently hijacked by forces of obscurantism.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Compatibility: The Pakhtun Culture, Talibanization and Obscenity
By Farhat Taj
One of the good things that has happened to Pakistan is the free media. The media’s educative and informative role in the society is commendable. The media, however, disappoint when it exhibits biases most probably unintentionally or when it promotes a particular view without even cross checking the facts on the ground. Such views constitute constructed realities in the public eye that are based on ideological fantasies or vested interest or ignorance of some people whose voices are reflected in the media. Solutions are then recommended based on the constructed realities to critical problems of national level. The solutions, disconnected from the facts on the ground, can affect no change.
In their zeal to be seen as ‘expert’ or at least ‘informed commentators’ on the Pakhtun culture, scores of discussants in media depict that Talibanization is somehow compatible with the Pakhtun culture. That confinement of women to homes, compulsory wearing of burqa, ban on female mobility in public sphere, minus those accompanied by related men, ban on girls’ education, ban on music, compulsory beards, killing people by slitting their throats, preference of madrassa over school education , compulsory punishments for not saying the daily five time obligatory Islamic prayers, and above all, going mad in revenge spree and eliminating innocent and perceived enemies without discrimination, all is Pakhtun culture.
They argue the Taliban’s Islam is not Islam, it is Pakhtun culture. The key premise seems to that a religion, especially a text based religion like Islam, is interpretation and interpretation is affected by culture. So, Islam, when seen through the lenses of Pakhtunwali turns out to be Talibanization.
One of those who project this view of Pakhtun culture is the ex-ISI chief General (Retd) Hamid Gul. His credential as pro-Taliban, pro-religious extremists in general and his role in Afghan Jihad that brought destruction of Afghanistan and the rise of radical Islam in Pakistan is beyond doubt. Still, surprisingly, the media anchors do not put him questions to investigate his view of the Pakhtun culture.
A journalist, Orea Maqbol Jan, in a TV talk show, Kalam Kar, claimed that even a Hindu woman in Pakhtun culture will have to wear shuttlecock burqa. To my utter disappointment, even Salman Ahmed of Junoon, one of my favorite musicians, displayed a similar distorted view of the Pakhtun culture. Addressing a gathering in Denmark, he referred to ‘mullah electricity’ in NWFP. Salman Ahmed said that ‘this (rejection of music) is his(mullah’s) culture’. The ‘mullah electricity’ is presumably mullah Bijli ghar. A laughing stock among Pakhtuns, one wonders since when mullah Biji Ghar became a symbol of the entire Pakhtun culture.
Equally disappointing is the self-proclaimed voice of the Pakhtuns, Imran Khan of the Tehrik Insaf Party. He argues that the Taliban’s spree of death and destruction is caused by the revengeful Pakhtuns, whose family members were supposedly killed in the on going military operation in FATA and other areas of NWFP. He rejects that religious extremism, systematically spread in FATA by the state agencies may have anything to do with the atrocities committed by the Taliban in Pakistan (and Afghanistan). Imran Khan’s argument portrays the Pakhtuns as savage and uncivilized people who can be so blinded by revenge that they become stripped of any capacity to differentiate between the innocent and the guilty. It implies that Pakhtuns can be driven so mad in revenge that they would bomb their own educational and health institutions, destroy the livelihoods of the fellow Pakhtuns and murder innocent people, both Pakhtun and non-Pakhtun, across Pakistan. Although, I have yet to see a Pakhtun so maddened by revenge, I still suppose there may be some people of this kind. I argue this is the personal decision of those people and has no justification in the code of Pakhtunwali for the purpose. Moreover, people so maddened by revenge may exist in any culture of the world.
These are but a few names who present such a false view of the Pukhtun culture in the media. There are scores of others. These people show disrespect to the Pakhtun culture, some out of ignorance (like Sulman Ahmed, I guess), some for ideological reasons (Gul Hamid), some for professional reasons (just to be seen as experts on something) and some for political reasons (like Imran Khan) . In addition to the disrespect to the Pakhtun cultures, these people display utter disregard to some of the established notions of the social science.
Most social scientists all over the world agree that human cultures are internally diverse, flexible, and adaptable. There are dominant norms in a culture and also less dominant norms, which coexist. Even the expression of the dominant norms can be diverse. Cultures are not written in stone. They are flexible: members of the culture may manage to push the limits of the culture within the framework of that culture. In line with the changing requirements of the time, cultures may adapt new ideas and norms from other cultures and societies. All this holds true for the Pakhtun culture. I will try to explain with some examples.
The ‘shuttlecock’ burqa that many identify with Pakhtun culture is a diminishing norm in some Pakhtun communities or localities. It is not a universal norm all over the Pakhtun land. A nearly universal norm is the chaddar, though the length, colour, and pattern of the chaddar varies from area to area, family to family, and even woman to woman. The way it is worn by women also varies: some may cover their faces with the chaddar, some may not.
Most Pakhtun communities stand for girls’ education: this is precisely the reason why the Taliban, whose worldview has no room for girls’ education, are destroying girls schools and colleges. One can name tens of girls’ schools and colleges in the Pakhtun area that government of Pakistan would have simply ignored to build, but thanks to the Pakhtun elders of the areas, mostly fathers and grandfathers, who pleaded with the government to build those girls educational institutions in their area and their requests finally moved the government in building those institutions.
The Taliban have now destroyed or are destroying those institutions. In almost very city and town of the Pakhtuns there have been growing number of communities and individual families, who have had exposure to education and modernity. Women in such communities and families have taken up non-traditional roles in the public sphere. Before the rise of the Taliban no one had ever heard of any Pakhtun community or individuals violently reacting to women who broke the confinements of the traditional gender roles.
The Taliban prohibit music, which is an integral part of the Pakhtun traditions. Before the rise of the Taliban no one ever heard of attacks on musicians and music shops. There have always been men with and without beard among the Pakhtuns. Those with beard never forced the others to grow beard. There have always been Pakhtun who were regular in saying daily prayers and those were not so regular and even those who hardly say any prayers for years and years. Before the Taliban, it was unheard of that those who are regular in saying daily prayers would force the others to be regular.
Imran Khan’s assertion that the Taliban unleashing the reign of terror on Pakistan are Pakhtuns driven by revenge essentiailizes the notion of revenge to the Pakhtun culture. Essentialism has been greatly challenged by social scientists all over the world. Essentialism is the belief that people have an unchanging 'essence' that wipes off the possibility of change. Most social scientists will disagree that each and very Pakhtun would take to violent means in the name of revenge. Agreed that revenge is an important notion of the code of Pakhtunwali, but, nevertheless, this a notion. When put in practice it may take different forms, not necessarily violent forms.
There is nothing in the code of Pakhtunwali that sanctions or even justifies indiscriminate use of violence in revenge. Revenge is a qualified notion in the code. There are clear limits to who can be targeted for revenge. Innocent people, women and children (even from the enemy’s family) are never the targets of revenge killing according to the code of Pakhtunwali. Such limits are not respected by the Taliban.
The Taliban’s world view is rooted in the narrow interpretation of Islam that has connections with religious extremists across the globe. This worldview is unified, inflexible, and violently resistant to adaptability. This is the exact opposite of the Pakhtun culture. Unlike Talibanization, the Pakhtun culture is rooted in the centuries old history and traditions that evolved in a geographical location.
During an interview with Fredrik Barth, a famous Norwegian scholar of the Pakhtun culture, this writer asked him whether he sees any compatibility between the Pakhtun culture and Talibanization. His answer was: ‘in terms of Pakhtun culture, Talibanization is obscenity’. So, there you have it! Anyone who knows the Pakhtun culture and is not motivated by a vested interest would reject any notion of compatibility between Talibanization and the Pakhtun culture. (To be continued)
Farhat Taj is a PhD research fellow at the Centre for Women and Gender Studies, University of Oslo.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Swat on the Verge of Civil War
By Khurshid Khan - www.valleyswat.net
Swat valley swat has been divided in two administrative units Tehsil Swat and Thesil Matta. Both have their separate councils. Matta Tehsil council consists of thirteen Union Councils. Abdul Jabar Khan is its elected Tehsil Nazim while Naib- Nazim Zakirullah khan has been killed in the recent imbroglio in swat. The area is called Bar Swat (Upper swat) in local vernacular. Matta Town is the main trading center as well as the administration headquarter some 22 miles away from Mingawara city. The total population of upper swat is 251368 according to the 1998 censuses. Its total area is about 683 square kilometres. The population annual growth rate is 3.04 %.
Upper swat has mainly divided into two territories, Shamizai and Sibujni Sebat khel, on the basis of Wesh (land distribution system). The inhabitants of Shamizai belong to Yusufzai tribe of Pukhtuns and are lead by Afzal khan. Subjini Sebat khel inhabited by Nazar Khel and Shama khel. Nazar khel are Shinwaries while Shama khel belongs to Tarkalani tribe. Sebujni also has Balol Khel and sena Khel. The people of labat, Gwalerai and above are Sena Khel
Upper Swat consists of two main valleys, Sakhra and Rodingar. Arnwai stream irrigates Rodingar valley up to Totkai While Bawrai stream irrigates Sakhra valley up to Bagderai. Shawarai stream irrigates the narrow valley of Shawar. This is the unfortunate and notorious valley where Gatt and Pewchar villages are situated. The national and international media has brought these areas into the spotlight in the recent time.
These valleys are well known for their natural beauty, fertile soil and agricultural produce. Fruit orchards are the main cash crop of the valleys. The famous Swat Apples are cultivated and produced here. The natural forests of Pines and Deodars and medicinal plants are also the income generation sources. The inhabitants of the area are considered rich and prosper people in swat. They stick to the strict code of Pukhtunwali. But unfortunately the whole swat in general and upper swat in particular is in the venomous tentacles of terror since last year. The significant and influential elders of the area have been murdered, migrated or detained in their houses and hujras. The houses of many influential are incinerated and looted.
The important strategic points over the heights across the valley are under the control of the security forces while the militants control the villages and hamlets in the outskirts of proper Matta Town. Explosions, kidnappings and murders have become day to day affairs in the area which are augmented by infinite and endless curfews. Most of the fruits and vegetables are wasted away due to non- accessibility to the main markets.
Last Sunday, October 26, 2008, the miserable people of the area encountered still another terrible situation. The local elders of Biha, Gwalerai and Bartanra union councils formed a jirga congregated in the main Mosque of Gwalerai. The jirga was debating on the issue of deteriorating law and order situation, security forces’ indiscriminate shellings and air strikes and the consequent public casualties, injuries and private property’s destruction. The main jirga formed a delegation and sent it to the official of the security forces for negotiation over the alarming deteriorating condition of the area. It is reported that the members of the delegation were ambushed when they were returning. It is also said that the waiting jirga members in the mosque were also attacked killing several elders and about 70 were abducted. Several of the abducted elders were butchered ruthlessly and their bodies were thrown in the fields. The local people said that most of the dwellers of the area remained busy in burying the deceased on Monday. Most of the renowned elders of these three union councils were slaughtered in this onslaught. In one of the village, Gwalerai, six members of the same family were killed including four brothers. One of the local journalists says “thirty funerals at a time in the area presented the spectacles of dooms day. This incident has wiped out the bitter memories of Bartanra air strikes”.
Militants freed four abducted leaders on Wednesday on the condition that they will deliver their message to the local people and inform them of their strict conditions after which the other abductees will be freed. The leaders met the local elders and persuaded them to conform to the conditions of Militants. The conditions are; that no one will even think about organizing a force against Militants and will never be a member of such an enterprise. That they will never support Pir Samiullah and will never meet the security forces. And that Militant will freely patrol the area and no one will put hurdles in their way.
After ensuring that these conditions will be followed in true spirits, the militants freed sixty five more abductees Thursday.
The local people say that raising a Lakhkar (a tribal force taking the field under the tribal banner at the time of need, at their own cost and with their own arms and ammunition) is not to wage war against militants and make ground for security forces arrival, but to establish peace and harmony in the area, reopen the educational institutes. and restore traffic on the roads. But instead of achieving these peaceful objectives we received only bloodshed and became victims of bloodshed and destruction only.
The security forces banned the local journalists and media from covering the event and imposed endless curfews in the area.
This situation has brought both Taliban and public face to face; the militants are in the “do or die” situation. The concept of revenge is so deep rooted in the Pukhtun society that it is next to impossible to remove this code from this society. This volatile situation has given rise to two speculations; people in the same household will raise guns in favour or against militants and the chances of the formation of Lakhkar are fading. If this war spreads out to each household, clan and village, the destruction and annihilation will generate a horrible situation.
This civil war must be stopped immediately, which can be accomplished through proper co-ordination among local, district and provincial authorities. A peace treaty between the militant and the local people and the withdrawal of militants from these areas can halt the disastrous civil war.
Another alarming development in the area is the mysterious appearance of a new and significant figure, Pir Samiullah of Tangar village of the area. He has his own circle of followers and admirers which spreads out to considerable area. In addition to this, the Gujar community also supports him due to ethnic affiliation. Local people said that Pir Samiullah is the only potential rival of militant leader Fazlullah in the area. A local Daily reported that security forces are taking extraordinary interest in this new development. The daily also reported the landing of military helicopters in Pir Samiullah‘s village on Monday.
If a war erupts between Pir Samiullah and militant leader Fazlullah, then the eye opening example of Bara in Khyber Agency should be serve as an example. Thus, this war may take the shape of sectarianism, which will be another shocking and new development in the history of swat. The alarming development will be the war between the militants and the local people in which the major losers will be the public. Uncountable human lives will be lost and properties damaged as a consequence of this venture.
The elders, representatives of swat and the provincial government who has its peace ambassador, should rise to the occasion and stop the impending calamity.
It is also the responsibility of organizations working for peace and the print and electronic media to come forward to make the ground work for the peace deal. If this movement does not commence now, then perhaps, it will not be needed.
Email: bazirkhan@gmail.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Is it Khyber Agency’s turn now?
A Comment - By Aimal Khan
The hijacking of several vehicles of Kabul-bound NATO supply convoy near Jamrud and the recent killing of seven militants belonging to a defunct militant group from Khyber Agency in US attacks near Pak-Afghan border is shifting the focus of war on terror to a new sector.
The US and NATO forces’ supply line passes through Khyber Agency and any disruption and law and order problem there can disturb this vital lifeline for coalition forces in Afghanistan. Despite high level interactions between the US and Pakistani political and military leadership, including the ISI chief recent visit to USA and chief of the US Central Command Gen. David Petraeus tour to Pakistan, their ties are not yet improved to satisfactory level.
In a dramatic move some unidentified masked gunmen took away more than a dozen trucks on Monday. There are frequent attacks on NATO supply vehicles in Khyber Agency but taking away loaded trucks in such a large number was a first incident of its kind in the area. Two gunship helicopters targeted suspected locations at Godar, Saurkamar and Varmado Mela areas of Jamrud, Khyber agency, after the incident. Two persons were killed and five wounded in the attack. As usual most of the causalities are reported to be civilians.
Earlier, seven activists of a defunct militant organization were killed and three others injured in an air blitz by the allied forces’ jetfighters in Nazian area of Afghan province of Nangarhar near the Pak-Afghan border on Sunday morning. Is it Khyber Agency’s destiny to burn? For the last few months some elements are bent upon to destroy the relative peace and tranquility in historical and internationally known Khyber Agency. It needs no scholarly mind to find answer to questions such as who is after the peace in tribal areas, including Khyber Agency and why the border and its adjacent areas are the hottest sectors in war on terror.
Ordinary people are fed up with the ongoing situation and they only wanted peace to carry out his or her normal activities. They wanted to live a peaceful life without any fear, intimidation and threat to his life, business and property. Some pertinent questions are agitating public mind how and who staged this brazen act of highjacking of NATO supply vehicles after the recent “successful operation” against the militants in Khyber agency.
Was the operation half-heartedly and eyewash or real and decisive? How after every military operation in the past such as in the Khyber agency, one militant group gets cornered and the other strengthens and the militancy emerges stronger? Where is the fault?
The common sense and collective wisdom of the tribesmen is very developed and they know the actors and factors of the surge in violence. But people are questioning the wisdom and intellect of the policy-makers who seemed to be visionless, incompetent and unresponsive. One wonders whether the authorities did not notice the emerging lawlessness in the Khyber agency and have no knowledge of it or they are helpless before the militants or deliberately ignore it for the reason best known to them. But in any case they are doing disservice to the country by not checking it and pre-empting it timely and even failing to bring the anti-social elements to justice. The militants also overlook one important fact that the main sufferer of the worsen law and order situation at or around the Peshawar-Torkhum highway in Khyber agency will be ordinary people than US and NATO and it can lead to erosion of its public support. The attack on NATO-bound supply convoy and taking away several its loaded vehicles by force indicating the boldness and courage of the attackers. It’s a very frightening sign and exposes the fragility of writ of the government in such a sensitive area.
The militant’s build up and recent terrorists incidents in and around the provincial headquarters is a clear message to the provincial government too. Whether the Militants’ are pressurizing the government or attempting to disturb the main NATO supply route or a third party is out to take advantage of the situation but in any case the situation in Khyber Agency will certainly leave deep impacts on Peshawar. Once the safest road Peshawar, Torkhum is becoming dangerous for travel due to the growing incidents of kidnappings for ransom and attacks and looting the NATO supply convoys. Even the local tribesmen are avoiding unnecessary travel on this historic road due to the worsening law and order situation.
Amid government apathy and incapability, and fearing Waziristan and Bajaur like situation, life in Khyber is becoming tense and people have started thinking to move to safe places. Should the authorities wait for worse to happen or do they have any responsibility concerning welfare, development, and protection of the citizens?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Role for Pashtun intelligentsia
By Khadim Hussain (http://www.dawn.com/2008/11/26/op.htm#1)
DIVERSE and usually contradictory approaches have been adopted by different actors, both national and international, in their response to the radicalisation, isolation and Talibanisation that is taking place in the Pashtun belt.There are some who believe that Pashtun culture is inherently militant, violent and aggressive and that Talibanisation and radicalisation in the region is the expression of Pashtun nationalist sentiment.
This approach assumes that all Pashtuns have a Taliban mindset ideologically and that the Taliban are a violent bunch of Al Qaeda-affiliated terrorists who need to be carpet-bombed without any consideration for the lives of the millions affected by this kind of attack.
There are others, such as individuals and political parties like Qazi Hussain Ahmad of the Jamaat-i-Islami, Maulana Fazlur Rahman of the JUI, Imran Khan of the Tehrik-i-Insaaf and Mian Nawaz Sharif of the PML-N, who are of the opinion that radicalisation and Talibanisation are essentially foreign phenomena that need to be analysed in the context of US intervention in the region.
This approach assumes that as long as what is perceived as the US occupation of the region continues, radicalisation and Talibanisation will persist and vitiate the socio-political and economic fabric of the Pashtun belt.
There are yet others, mainly in the corridors of power in Islamabad, who presume that the Taliban of Pakistan and the Taliban of Afghanistan are completely distinct ideological, strategic and functional entities that must be dealt with separately. The Taliban of Pakistan are to be manipulated to fight the military's war in Kashmir and the Taliban of Afghanistan are to be covertly and strategically supported to minimise the perceived Indian influence in the region.
There are people who understand the causes of radicalisation in terms of chronic poverty, penetration of the modern Wahhabi jihadist ideology through madressahs, crumbling institutions of governance, lack of access to formal and informal justice systems, hegemonic intervention of the international powers, destabilisation of elected governments, and marginalisation and 'otherisation' of a whole community, i.e. the Pashtuns.
They also point to the lack of infrastructural development, the strategic-depth policy of the Pakistan army and lack of economic opportunities in the region as factors promoting radicalisation. This approach emphasises the need for development of responsive governance and justice systems, investment in the region and helping Pakistan and Afghanistan to repair their broken security, law and order and socio-political institutions.
The complex dynamics of the present violence in the Pashtun belt in particular and the rest of Pakistan and Afghanistan in general has confused Pakistani and western intellectuals. In the absence of fieldwork data and authentic evidence due perhaps to the inaccessibility of the region, analysts usually find themselves at a loss in identifying diverse factors that contribute to terrorism and religious militancy in the Pashtun belt.
Consequently they usually adopt a one-dimensional approach to address the complexity of the picture by analysing half-baked and incomplete data. It is this lack of clarity that usually leads analysts in Pakistan and elsewhere to term the present insurgency in the Pashtun belt of Pakistan and Afghanistan as a class war, a war of liberation, an expression of nationalistic sentiments, culture and identity of the Pashtuns, and a war against US imperialism.
As a result, the core issues are usually ignored. They are: (i) this is an economically, politically and socially unstable region which is fast turning into a never-ending war zone; (ii) the interplay of different forces in the region has led to continuous tension; (iii) the conflict is resulting in the mass killing of the non-combatants caught in the crossfire between the state and non-state forces in the area; (iv) the disintegration and deterioration of the social structures of the Pashtun belt is taking place; (v) there is an increased trend towards violence and terrorism around the globe that sends threat waves to the adjacent regions; (vi) an unnecessary engagement of resources is taking place which could have been otherwise a source of progress and prosperity for people in the Pashtun belt as well as those from other societies of the world; and (vii) no competing force in the region is able to decimate competing forces, and so there is a need to find and identify the overlapping and common interests of these forces in the region.
The Pashtun intelligentsia has yet to rise to the occasion and start scrutinising the threat to the survival of their nation and community on the basis of a people-centered analytical framework to find a way out of the present turbulence in their region. The Pashtun intelligentsia in Pakistan, Afghanistan and the diaspora may play a pivotal role in bringing peace and prosperity to the region and save their brethren in Pakistan and Afghanistan from total annihilation.
The Pashtun intelligentsia in Pakistan, Afghanistan and the diaspora may include university teachers, researchers and analysts in the regional and area study centres, media outlets and political parties. They may focus on three major and core issues to begin with.
First, there is need to develop indigenous and people-centred analytical frameworks to understand the complexity of the present turmoil in the region. Second, they should identify overlapping and shared interests of various competing forces in the region. Third, they may start networking with area study centres and regional study centres besides security, defence and rights organisations around the globe. There is a dire need that the Pashtun intelligentsia starts establishing think tanks and networks with the think tanks working on the region outside Pakistan and Afghanistan.
The Pashtun intelligentsia may facilitate progressive nationalist political parties both in Pakistan and Afghanistan to adopt policies which are based on solid research and analysis of the present situation. The political parties in turn may facilitate the intelligentsia to establish forums for dialogue at all levels, both vertically and horizontally. The dialogue forums may include local, national and international stakeholders in the region on the one hand and various ideological factions on the other.
In addition to it the Pashtun intelligentsia should make an effort to reactivate the already available forums like the grand Pak-Afghan jirga, the Saarc platform, the ECO platform and other initiatives by UN agencies like Unesco and the UNDP. In the present gloomy environment in the region, activism by the intelligentsia is one of the beacons of hope for peace and prosperity in the region.
The writer is coordinator for Aryana Institute for Regional Research and Advocacy.
kahdim.2005@gmail.com
A Tribal Strategy for Afghanistan
Author: Greg Bruno, Staff Writer
Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
http://www.cfr.org/publication/17686/tribal_strategy_for_afghanistan.html?breadcrumb=%2Fregion%2F280%2Fafghanistan
- Introduction
- A New Strategy?
- Kabul Takes the Lead
- Leveraging Ancient Support
- Complex Tribal System
Introduction
In the hunt for a new strategy in Afghanistan, U.S. military commanders are studying the feasibility of recruiting Afghan tribesmen (LAT) to target Taliban and al-Qaeda elements. Taking a page from the so-called "Sunni Awakening" in Iraq, which turned Sunni tribesmen against militants first in Anbar Province and then beyond, the strategic about-face in Afghanistan would seek to extend power from Kabul to the country's myriad tribal militias. Gen. David Petraeus, the former top commander in Iraq who now heads U.S. Central Command, has talked openly of this ground-up approach, telling the New York Times that "in certain areas local reconciliation initiatives hold some potential." But other military leaders and regional analysts warn that while reliance on Afghan tribes could prove effective in some regions, the strategy is also fraught with pitfalls that have the potential to further destabilize the country. "There's always concerns that it has to be done correctly," Gen. David D. McKiernan, the current commander of NATO forces in Afghanistan, said in October 2008, "or you get back into the problems of armed militias, of support to warlords, of corrupt practices."
A New Strategy?
Gen. Petraeus has ordered a formal review (WashPost) of U.S. strategy for Afghanistan that will focus on at least two themes: possible government reconciliation with the Taliban; and cooperation with neighboring countries, including Pakistan and Iran. Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, speaking on the sidelines of a NATO summit in Budapest in October 2008, said he favored some form of reconciliation in Afghanistan, though he acknowledged not knowing "how it would evolve." A week later, during a speech at the U.S. Institute for Peace in Washington, Gates was unequivocal in his support of bringing tribal elements into the fold. "At the end of the day the only solution in Afghanistan is to work with the tribes and provincial leaders in terms of trying to create a backlash ... against the Taliban," the defense secretary said.
"At the end of the day the only solution in Afghanistan is to work with the tribes and provincial leaders in terms of trying to create a backlash...against the Taliban." —Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates.
If U.S. commanders do turn to Afghanistan's tribes-a similar strategy is already being employed by Pakistan in that country's tribal regions-it would amount to a significant reversal for Washington and for the war's planners. British Prime Minister Gordon Brown suggested in December 2007 that international forces should "increase our support for community defense initiatives" such as the Afghan arbakai-networks of tribal militias that serve as voluntary village defense forces in the country's southeast. But the idea was initially given little credence by Brown's American counterparts. In January 2008, for instance, U.S. Gen. Dan McNeill, McKiernan's predecessor as commander of NATO forces, told the Financial Times that the British proposal was potentially disastrous. "What we should not do is take actions that will reintroduce militias of the former power brokers," McNeill said. As recently as September 2008 U.S. military commanders maintained that relying on tribes was a bad idea, according to a report (PDF) from the Congressional Research Service. Now, Seth G. Jones, an analyst at the RAND Corporation, says bringing Afghan tribes into the mix may be the only way to restore stability, though he and other experts stress a tribal strategy would be only part of a potential solution.
Afghanistan's recent history has been dominated by war and central control. But this pattern is relatively recent. For instance, during the reigns of Mohammed Zahir Shah (1933-1973), and the Taliban (1996-2001), central authorities ceded significant power to tribal leaders. "Part of the recipe for stability [during Zahir Shah's tenure] was a competent, legitimate central government that had the ability to establish order in urban areas of the country ... and a tacit agreement with local tribes, subtribes, and clans in rural areas of the country," Jones says. "Finding some medium between the two is what has kept Afghanistan stable in its stable periods."
Kabul Takes the Lead
The rise in violence that began in 2006 has led U.S. commanders to explore a ground-up approach, but details on how a tribal reconciliation program might work are still being hammered out. About the only certainty, experts say, is that any reconciliation program must be managed and implemented by the Afghan government. "This needs to be an Afghan-led effort on how to engage the tribes and what the incentives are and how to use the traditional tribal authorities to help with community security and community assistance," Gen. McKiernan told reporters in October 2008. Kabul is already showing leadership on alternate strategies; it pledged alongside Pakistani officials to begin talks with Taliban groups, another strategy Washington was slow to endorse.
"What we should not do is take actions that will reintroduce militias of the former power brokers." —Gen. Dan McNeill, former NATO commander in Afghanistan
Yet some observers have been critical of the Afghan-led approach in the past. In June 2006 President Hamid Karzai authorized arming arbakai in southern and eastern Afghanistan to secure the border between Afghanistan and Pakistan. The region is predominantly Pashtun-the major ethnolinguistic group that dominates the country's south and east. Afghan Defense Minister Rahim Wardak said at the time that the initiative was aimed at recruiting local militiamen into the national police force (RFE/RL). The minister said the program would not undermine international disarmament efforts, such as the Disarmament, Demobilization, and Reintegration (DDR) and Disbandment of Illegal Armed Groups (DIAG) programs. But Ahmed Rashid, a Pakistani journalist, said at the time that Karzai's move was a "complete reversal" of efforts to strengthen the central government, and predicted that arming Pashtun militias in the south would renew tribal rivalries that had been dormant for years; some analysts believe that has happened.
Similar concerns were raised in October 2008, as talk of a U.S.-backed effort intensified. General Nur-al Haq Olumi, a member of parliament from Kandahar Province, told the Kabul-based daily Payman, according to a translation by the BBC, that distributing guns in the south while simultaneously supporting national efforts to disband and disarm militias was contradictory and potentially destructive. The Afghan paper Hasht-e Sobh, also translated by the BBC, underscored the point in an editorial: "The fact that these forces may become new warlords is not mere speculation. It is an irrefutable truth." Others fear that by arming Pashtun tribes, rivalries could be reignited; they point to unresolved conflict between the Hazara minority and nomads in central Afghanistan as a possible source of friction. Aware of the risks, Karzai has relocated warlords to stem regional violence. One example: He appointed as minister of energy the veteran mujahedeen commander Ismail Khan, who once controlled a sizeable portion of the country from his northwestern base of operations in Herat Province.
Leveraging Ancient Support
Framing these regional power struggles-and any new ground-up strategy-are a complex and baffling array of tribal actors. Pashtuns are represented by dozens of major tribal groups (though two "super tribes," the Durrani and Ghilzai, have historically been among the most influential) with hundreds of subtribes. The most sought-after partnership discussed in any potential U.S.-NATO-Afghan tribal cooperation would involve the arbakai. Akin to local police and courted by the Karzai government, the arbakai defend communities and enforce the decisions of tribal councils, or jirgas. A September 2004 report (PDF) by the International Legal Foundation describes their traditional duties: "In ancient Aryan tribes, the Arbakai led groups of warriors in wartime and maintained law and order in peacetime. Today, they take orders from a commander. They are given considerable immunity in their communities and cannot be harmed or disobeyed. Those who flout these rules are subject to the punishments set by the Arbakai organization." More recently, these self-regulating militias have been especially adept (Economist) at keeping the Taliban at bay in areas where tribal structures are strongest. Pashtun tribes adhere to an ancient code of honor and revenge known as Pashtunwali; the Taliban have struggled to promote their vision of sharia law in Pashtunwali regions, the Economist notes. But experts say it would be premature to assume Pashtun militias would be open to cooperating with international forces: Pashtun disdain for outsiders is not discriminatory.
"This needs to be an Afghan-led effort on how to engage the tribes and what the incentives are and how to use the traditional tribal authorities to help with community security and community assistance." —Gen. David McKiernan, commander of NATO troops in Afghanistan.
Non-Pashtun tribes and warlords dominating northeastern and western regions of the country are even more of a wild card, analysts say. Jake Sherman, a former UN official in Afghanistan, writes in a 2005 assessment of Afghan warlords that Badakhshan and Takhar Provinces in the country's northeast have historically been hotbeds for unofficial militias (PDF). The center of Soviet resistance in the 1980s, these mountainous provinces have been home to tens of thousands of militants, many led by independent commanders with little regard for local and central governmental structures. Jones, the RAND analyst, says one issue Western commanders will have to reconcile is that a bottom-up approach, by design, will empower local actors "at the expense of the central government." That shouldn't be a deal breaker, however. "That's just the way Afghanistan has historically worked, including in its periods of peace," Jones says.
Complex Tribal System
NATO commander Gen. McKiernan says turning to tribes will not be fast or easy; many have been engaged in isolated struggles for decades, and arming the wrong ones could return Afghanistan's warlords to power. "What I find in Afghanistan ... is a degree of complexity in the tribal system which is much greater than what I found in Iraq years ago," he said. "I would not want ISAF [International Security Assistance Force] military commanders to be trying to decide which tribe should they support without letting the Afghan government do that. It's simple as that."
Part of the reluctance for a heavy U.S. hand is perception: the United States and its allies do not want to be seen as meddling in the affairs of tribes and clans that have historically opposed outsiders. But beyond perception is sheer complexity; Western commanders may need Afghan expertise. Maps of Afghan tribal divisions in the south (PDF) and east (PDF) illustrate the intermingling factions within Afghan society. Jones says coercing tribes to side with coalition forces will require manipulating regional allegiances and tribal motivations, a strategy the Taliban employed with acumen during their rise to power in the late 1990s.
And still, Afghan experts dispute whether reliance on such networks can succeed. Peter Bergen, a terrorism analyst and a fellow at the New America Foundation, says he sees potential positives with employing a strategy similar to the Sunni Awakening in Iraq. "Ordinary Afghans tend to trust their tribal shuras [councils] to solve their problems, and these 'Sons of Afghanistan' could fill the security void (PDF) until the Afghan army and police grew in size and ability so as to be able to secure the country-a process likely to take many years," Bergen writes. But Bergen shares the concern that a reckless approach could fuel a return to warlordism. CFR Senior Fellow Daniel Markey sees another reason for caution. He says as tempting as it may be to transfer successful strategies from one war to another, Afghanistan is not Iraq. "It falls into the question of hierarchical versus egalitarian social structure," Markey says, comparing Iraq with Afghanistan. "What does bribing somebody get you? If you bribe a person in an egalitarian structure ... even if he seems to be a tribal elder, you may get almost nothing" in return.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org
Frontier Gandhi: Badshah Khan, a Torch for Peace
T.C. (Teri) McLuhan (CAN) 2008 93 min
Twenty-one years in the making, The Frontier Gandhi tells the extraordinary story of Badshah Khan, a unique Muslim peacemaker born into the unimaginable violence of Pashtun warrior society of Pakistan’s North-West Frontier. His achievements were pronounced “a miracle” by Mahatma Gandhi himself, but Badshah Khan raised – in the heart of violence on what is now the Afghan/Pakistan border – a 100,000 strong nonviolent army of men, women, and youngsters that was comprised of Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Parsees, Sikhs, and Buddhists. In partnership with Gandhi he worked for the freedom of India and fought for justice and peace for all humanity. Notable Indian actor Om Puri provides the voice of Khan, who passed away at the ripe old age of 98 in 1988. T.C. (Teri) McLuhan is a filmmaker and author based in New York. Her films include The Shadow Catcher and The Third Walker. She has also written five books on sacred space and the core values of diverse cultures across the world. She is the daughter of famous academic Marshall McLuhan.
http://eng.riff.is/docs/obyggea-gandhi-badshah-khan-kyndilberi-friear
Dear Readers,
We are receiving a lot of encouragement, suggestions, opinions, and articles from many of you, which we greatly value. Please keep the inputs coming, though, we reserve editorial rights. We also ask you to join us in trying to understand the root causes of the war imposed on over 50 million Pashtuns and contribute to bringing peace to Pashtun land and the region. We believe that a small step in that direction could be sharing the IDEAS Magazine widely.
The IDEAS – Magazine Vol. 4 is dedicated to Farhat Taj - a Pashtun PhD research fellow at the Centre for Women and Gender Studies, University of Oslo and Teri McLuhan the film maker and director of “The Frontier Gandhi: Badshah Khan, a Torch for Peace”. Teri is the daughter of the Canadian media theorist, Marshall McLuhan.
We plan to facilitate screening of “The Frontier Gandhi: Badshah Khan, a Torch for Peace” film in the Greater Toronto Area of Canada.
We hope you find the magazine informative.
Thank You,
Pashtun Peace Forum – Canada (E: pashtuninstitute@yahoo.com)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer
In order to promote discussion of issues regarding peace and development in Pashtun areas, the Pashtun Peace Forum (PPF) publishes articles on a regular basis. The views expressed in articles published in IDEAS or on www.pashtunpeaceforum.org are those of the authors alone. The authors do not represent the views or opinions of PPF volunteer board, nor do they represent the views or opinions of the any entity affiliated with the PPF.
IDEAS
EDITORIAL: Suggestions …………….. 1
Staying with the Principles ………… 2
New Waziristan in the Making? …. 3
Casting the First Stone ................... 9
Changing the Guard in Pakistan,
again ............................................. 14
Future in Flames............................ 16
Solving FATA ................................. 22
Taliban Violently Campaigns
Against Girls' Education............... 24
A Door Opens for Reform
in Pakistan – Part II…................... 26
Why Pakistan is reactivating
the Kashmir front ….....................30
Need for Pushto centre .............. 32
Will Zardari follow
Musharraf …..................................33
International Day of Peace ……... 35
------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial Board
S. Zulfiqar Gilani (Editor-in Chief)
Jahan Zeb Khan
Naeem Khan
Inayat Khan Kakar
----------------------------------------------
Pashtun Peace Forum
120 Wentworth Street North
Hamilton, ON L8L 5V7, Canada
E:pashtuninstitute@yahoo.com
Web: pashtunpeaceforum.org
Tel: (905) 296 4612,(905)277 2854
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Editorial:
The IDEAS - the newsletter of Pashtun Peace Forum (PPF) is being issued for two months now. The primary purpose in starting this newsletter was to provide an additional source of information about the problem of militancy in Pak-Afghan border region. Another reason for starting this newsletter was to present the views of the locals about the issue, which don’t get projected due to poor media representation.
Since the first issue of the newsletter, many members/readers have responded with useful suggestions and generous appreciation despite the many shortcomings of our endeavour. The IDEAS team is thankful for this encouraging response from our members and readers. However, after deliberations about matters related to managing the preparation of the newsletter and improving its quality, the IDEAS team has decided to make it bimonthly. With this change we think that it would be possible for us to work more on the format and presentation issues of the newsletter. Furthermore, the relatively longer period would give us and our contributors more time to collect and develop more relevant and thorough material for the newsletter. We request our valued and honourable members to help us with their useful suggestions about this change.
Moreover, we also need active participation from our members and readers not only in terms of suggestions/feedback about the format and related matters but also in contributing articles and other intellectual input. We think that as the problem in the target region has wider (regional/global) implications, therefore, it is necessary that a broader and diverse intellectual community is involved in discussing it and suggesting means and ways to solve it. The IDEAS team is open to useful opinions and views about the issue and will earnestly welcome it.
The IDEAS team also wants to make the magazine (formerly newsletter) as a mean to disseminate knowledge about the practical ways and strategies focussing on social-sector and community-based work to solve the problem. In this regard, we think that potential contributors among our readers and members the world-over can greatly help us with their experience and knowledge of work in such problem-areas. In the end, the IDEAS team thanks members and readers for their help and encouragement.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Staying with the Principles:
An opinion
By Dr. Ijaz Khan - University of Peshawar
Whether it is Presidential elections or the issue of restoration of judiciary, we must take a stand based on principles that will promote peace and progress on the Pashtun land. The issue is not of a Punjabi judge (this refers to Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, the constitutional Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan); the issues are of the rule of law and the power of a Military Chief to amend constitution, impose emergency, and dismiss judges. If we agree to that then there is no need to support the restoration of the judiciary through non acceptance of the Nov .3 actions of the then military dictator. The issue is also not Zardari's corruption, his intellectual level, and commitment to democracy, or his alleged criminal person; as in the Pakistan of today that is quite the norm amongst our so-called leaders.
The issue is concentration of powers.Mr. Zardari is not becoming President to just drive in horse driven buggies with ambassadors, he wants undiluted power. So, his presidency most likely means no repeal of 17th amendment. Mr. Zardari will become President with all the powers of Gen. Musharaf. Gen. Musharaf had at least the Corp Commanders to satisfy. The Pakistan Peoples Party’s Executive Committee is by now largely a rubber stamp and cannot hold Mr. Zardari accountable. So, just imagine Mr. Zardari more powerful than even Bhutto the senior (Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto).
Well okay, our issue is Peace on the Pashtun land. I believe as a nationalist that in the current situation democratization of the state and society of Pakistan is the best way to start the long journey of Pashtun unity, peace, and progress. Democracy and rule of law are the same; one without the other is not imaginable. Parliamentary democracy that most of us in the smaller nationalities believe to be the best system guaranteeing our rights can not be achieved with a powerful presidency. So, it is not the issue of a Punjabi CJ or a Sindhi Presidency. We had seen a very powerful Sindhi PM in the past as well (reference is to Z. A. Bhutto). We must remember that his targets were nationalists. The concern is that once Zardari has dealt with Punjab, or even while he is doing that, he will turn his eyes to Peshawar and the government there.
In the situation, we must try to bring PMAP and ANP together for peace through democracy and not peace through Talibanization or Punjabization. They had a started a good process of mutual consultations. They need to re-start that. There is no need at the moment to agree. They can just meet once a month and debate and discuss. We must understand the distances of decades do need some time to be covered.
____________________________________________________________________________________
New Waziristan in the Making?
By Naeem Khan - Canada
The military action against insurgents in the Bajaur Tribal agency is now in the third week of its commencement. The operations began in the first week of August 2008 immediately after the Prime Minister Gilani concluded a visit to the US. Before Bajuar, similar operations have intermittently been carried out in Waziristan, Swat, Khyber Agency, and more recently in Kurram Agency albeit with little headway. The operations in Waziristan are in fact in progress for many years but have failed to dislodge militants from their fortifications.
The latest showdown between government forces and militants in Bajaur has given a new momentum to the process of destabilization in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) (Pakhtunkhwa) and Pakistan’s federally administered tribal areas (FATA). So far hundreds of people, including a large number of civilians, have been killed in the encounter and number of public facilities and civilian property like schools, healthcare centers, bridges, hotels, and houses has been destroyed in acts of sabotage by militants and indiscriminate bombardment by the Pakistan military. The impact of war on local economy and structures of governance and service-provision will also become evident with the passage of time.
(A camp for over 250,000 Internally Displaced People (IDPs) in Bajuar Agency - NWFP
(Pukhtunkhwa) Pakistan – September 2008)
Despite these problems, resolve of the PPP-led federal and ANP-led provincial government in Pakistan to fight the insurgency in FATA seems strong. The interior minister Mr. Rahman Malik has said in a statement that the govt would either have to fight back or give in to militancy and Prime Minister Gilani has vowed to take the war to the doorsteps of terrorist dens. The chief minister of Pakhtunkhwa, Amir Haider Hoti, has adopted a rather tougher stance who declared categorically in an interview to a private TV channel that militants wouldn’t be extended amnesty even if they give up violence.
In such a security environment, the expansion of the battle ground to other areas especially Momand agency and further loss of stability seem imminent.
While there cannot be a second opinion about the inevitability of military action against the insurgency in FATA, there remain genuine doubts about the decisiveness/efficacy of the operations and the ability of the govt to limit the resulting violence to militancy-infected zones. Political turmoil, economic meltdown, public sentiments, external factors, and internal support bases for militants may hamper progress of war on terror or even further worsen it.
POLITICAL INSTABILITY AND THE PUNJAB FACTOR
The coalition partners in power at Islamabad not only have almost unbridgeable differences over issues like re-instatement of judges and presidential candidacy but also seem to have divergent, if not conflicting, views and approaches on war on terror. Of the two major coalition partners, the PML-N is mainly a Punjab-based party and as such, its stance on war on terror is in line with the strategic vision of the security and intelligence establishment of Pakistan, which is also overwhelmingly Punjab-dominated.
Further, as a dominant province, patriotic fervour in Punjab regarding the status of Pakistan as the foremost Muslim military and nuclear power is the strongest. Kashmir and the position of Pakistan vis-à-vis other powers in the region are also intensely sentimental issues for the people of Punjab. Therefore, any regional or domestic development that threatens the status quo within Pakistan or in the region arouses dangerous reaction in Punjab.
Popular or strong leaders from smaller provinces have in the past faced stiff resistance or ultimate ouster from power. Liaqat Ali Khan, the first Prime Minister of Pakistan and an Urdu speaker from the Muhajir community, Shiekh Mujibu-u-Rahman a popular Bangali leader from erstwhile East Pakistan, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto a Sindhi, and Benazir Bhutto, a Sindhi again, have fallen victims to this phenomenon. The ouster of Musharaf from power should also be seen in this backdrop. These were mainly the political-bureaucratic elite, the middle classes, and the media from Punjab that spearheaded the “resistance” movement against Musharaf.
Benazir Bhutto, ex Prime Minister of Pakistan and the slain PPP leader was considered a security risk by the Pakistani establishment. Asif Ali Zardari from Sindh is despised even more partly also due the stigma of corruption rightly or wrongly associated with him.
The possible alliance between PPP, MQM, which represents Muhajirs of Karachi, and ANP based in NWFP and Baluchistan may push powerful forces from the dominant province, including military, civil bureaucracy, political parties like PML-N and Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf (PTI) of Imran Khan, and media to pitch against PPP and destabilise its government. It is highly likely that ultra-religious parties Jummath-i-Islami join such alliance.
PPP is a national party with secular and liberal credentials but its unity has been weakened by the assassination of its central leader Benazir Bhuto. Many PPP stalwarts e.g. Aitizaz Hassan, Naheed Khan, Nasirullah Babar, etc. have been maintaining low profile in party matters for a long time. Makhdum Amin Fahim, another prominent PPP leader from the Sindh province, seems to be on a confrontation course with Asif Ali Zardari, the current central figure of the party.
PPP wings in Baluchistan and NWFP are weak. And it is increasingly loosing ground to PML-N of Nawaz Sharif and Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf (PTI) of Imran Khan -both Punjab centric parties - in Punjab particularly in urban centers due to factors like new socio-economic dynamics and weak provincial leadership.
The rise of Asif Ali Zardari as the new leader of the party for the intermediate period till the dynastic transition to the “legal heir” Bilawal Zardari completes and his struggle to consolidate hold over the party is as risky and potentially divisive as unifying. A lot would depend on the political skills of Asif Ali Zardari to keep the party united and strong especially at the leadership level. But the chances of that seem grim. Should his adversaries and enemies within the politics and state institutions decide to weaken the party, they may conveniently do it by exploiting these vulnerabilities.
Overall, it seems, PPP will mostly be occupied with internal party problems and maintaining hold over power. Further, Punjab-centric forces together with religious parties may undermine PPP efforts to fight an effective war against terror. A lot will also depend upon the political behaviour of its coalition partners in the center and provinces.
THE FRONTLINE PROVINCE
In NWFP, the coalition govt of ANP and PPP seems stable. But future of the ANP-PPP alliance in the province will depend on as how much mutual progress do the two parties make on the proposed constitutional package, especially its points related to the renaming of the province (NWFP) and issue of the concurrent list. According to informed circles, political forces from Punjab, especially PML-N is contesting both these points. FATA status is another issue on which ANP wants the federal government to take a quick and determined action.
As for war on terror is concerned, the alliance government of ANP-PPP is right on the front line paying the political as well as physical cost of the war, especially ANP. Probably ANP is the only party with an un-ambiguous stance on peace in FATA and Afghanistan but the provincial government has no influence on national security or foreign policy, the two of the key-determinants of security situation along the Pak-Afghan border. Furthermore, it faces many challenges in the war on terror, including the noncommittal attitude of the state apparatus and a deadly insurgency willing to retaliate violently even against civilian targets.
Stiff opposition from religious parties like Jumaath-i-Islami and Jumiath Ulama-i-Islam, which openly supports militancy in Afghanistan as a “holy war” against foreign occupation, further complicates the problem. A demonstration of that was recently witnessed when the ANP-government launched a military operation in Hangu in July this year. In reaction to the offensive, Baitullah Masood, the chief of Tehrik-i-Taleban Pakistan (TTP) war-lord, gave it a stern ultimatum to leave the government within five days. A local leader of Jummaath-i-Islami, Shabbir Ahmad, reinforced the militant-call with a public statement asking the ANP-led provincial government not to act on the directives of US govt.
The personal security of ANP leaders and prominent members is also under threat. A number of its leaders have been killed in Swat valley and many have migrated to Peshawar to escape threat to their lives. Last week, brother of a local MPA was killed along with his sons and security guards and his house was demolished in an attack by a group of 200 well-armed militants.
ECONOMIC MELTDOWN AND THE POWER CRISIS
With inflation sky-high at 25% and foreign reserves dwindled to 9.56 billion dollars, the Pakistan’s economy is in very bad shape. According to the latest consumer-price index, the cost of perishable items has risen by 34.5% and non-perishable items are up by 22.9%.
Aggravating the problem is the severe power and food crisis. The economic woes may divert much of the government attention from war.
[Militants demolished the Hujra (built in 1929) of Barram Khan, grandfather of Waqar Khan who is member of NWFP Provincial Assembly and member of ANP. Militants also killed MPA’s brother, his two nephews and 7 security guards. According to reports, Pakistan Army was stationed at about 200 meters from the Hujra. (Photo by Khurshid Khan - www.valleyswat.net)]
Although, the effect of the economic meltdown is countrywide, its impact is likely to be more severe in the militancy-hit areas, which are already underdeveloped and impoverished.
Part of the local economy e.g. in Bajaur, Momand, Kurram, Waziristan etc. depends on agriculture, tourism, transportation, and foreign remittance by expatiates in the Gulf countries. The local communities had developed significant tracts of land for farming with money sent by expatiates in the past two decades and were producing certain vegetables like onions, tomatoes, etc, in large quantities. The produce was transported to the markets down country for cash-sale. According to an estimate, before 2001,150-200 of heavy-truck loads of vegetables and fruits was daily sent from Waziristan in summer and fall seasons to markets in Punjab and Sindh.
The land in these areas was irrigated by drilling the underground water. Initially, diesel-oil was used for drilling but as the oil prices had risen, farmers had switched to cheaper electric energy. But there were common complaints of poor irrigation due to low voltage and long hours of power-outage. Now the present power-shortages might have made the problem more acute.
The military operations in Bajaur will also affect the agricultural production because vegetables and crops are sown in summer there and harvested in October to December. Now that activity has been disrupted and it would be slowed down further if normalcy couldn’t be restored quickly and effectively.
IDEOLOGY AND MILITARY POWER AS A SOURCE OF NATIONAL LEGITIMACY AND PRESTIGE